[CCWG-ACCT] The big test of effective accountability

[Avri Doria]

Hi,

Model UN, now I understand the problem  You did model UN.
Polite hyperbola is the rule.

My issue is that if we don't recognize the mechanisms we have, albeit
imperfect, we can't fix them

To say we have none means we need to start from scratch, and that would
be unfortunate.  We have a lot to build on.

I also disagree with the notion that we need just OFS - one
[fundamental] source - of accountability.  We need a system of checks
and balances with some binding bits.  That is why in the other CWG I am
against nuclear options as the only defense, it is so messy having only
a sledge hammer when there are tasks to be done around the house.

avri


On 29-Jan-15 17:28, Jonathan Zuck wrote:
> Ok, if I was back in Model UN, I would argue that non-binding
> accountability is /not/ accountability but since we all have lives and
> have a charter to come up with a type of accountability we all agree
> we do NOT have, I guess my only point is let’s focus on getting that
> in place.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150129/686f7fa6/attachment.html>