[CCWG-ACCT] Redactions in ICANN documents

[Chris Disspain]

I don’t believe much ‘convincing’ would be necessary el.


Cheers,

Chris

> On 17 Jul 2015, at 17:52 , Dr Eberhard W Lisse <el at lisse.NA> wrote:
> 
> I am wondering if we can perhaps convince ICANN to in the interim
> when they redact documents, to write something like "Redacted on
> request of ........"  so that if we were to take ICANN staff by
> their word that they only redact because of transparency (!)  we
> know at least which side they are on :-)-O
> 
> greetings, el
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150717/b216026f/attachment.html>