[CCWG-ACCT] New topics / concerns - initiating discussions

[Kavouss Arasteh]

Mathieu
Tks for reply
Yes no problem to discuss briefly but not embark on that
Regards
Kavouss

2015-06-23 11:41 GMT+02:00 Dr Eberhard W Lisse <el at lisse.na>:

> Not an original attempt at all, call "Interesting" but not deal with the
> substance.
>
> Even if we assumed that we could compel ICANN to do our bidding after they
> got what they want, which as past behavior is a good indicator for future
> behavior, I am not convinced we will, I remain not in agreement with
> putting something in just so we can make the deadline.
>
> Or because the Intellectual Property community and other big commercial
> interests can fund lobbyists, this particular one not even being a
> chartered member, to try and drive the process.
>
> That ICANN is so enthusiastic with this should make one think.
>
> el
> --
> Sent from Dr Lisse's iPad mini
>
> On Jun 23, 2015, at 00:53, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Mathieu,
>
> Thank you for these.  While these are interesting issues, I think that our
> first priority should be discussing and refining the Empowered SO/AC
> Proposal.  This is the primary hurdle to a proposal that is likely to
> satisfy a broad spectrum of stakeholders.
>
> These will be interesting discussion topics, and may be great Work Stream
> 2 subjects, but we have ask what we need to resolve so that Work Stream 1
> and thus our Proposal work.  If there is time, we can then discuss these
> points.
>
> Greg
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 5:47 PM, Mathieu Weill <mathieu.weill at afnic.fr>
> wrote:
>
>> Dear Colleagues,
>>
>> As discussed last friday when we reviewed the public comments, some of
>> the feedback we have received require us to consider whether and how we
>> should address several topics :
>> - staff accountability culture
>> - Board duties and roles
>> - enhancing diversity
>> - enhancing SO/AC accountability
>>
>> In order to kick start discussions on these topics, we have assembled one
>> pagers attempting to describe each issue (based essentially on comments we
>> have received) as well some of the potential actions that were suggested.
>> Please note that these are discussion papers and in no way reflect any
>> "position" on the matters.
>>
>> It is anticipated that we could have initial discussions on these topics
>> In our upcoming work sessions. But this mailing list is also an appropriate
>> place to share your reflections on these matters, as I noted Jordan already
>> did on another thread.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> --
>> Mathieu WEILL
>>
> [...]
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150623/b0cf6dff/attachment.html>