[CCWG-ACCT] [ccTLDcommunity] ICANN transition

[Burr, Becky]

Speaking for myself, I find all of this pretty upsetting, particularly
since ICANN seems to be blaming the USG for this position, and my
impression is that the USG doesn¹t share this perspective at all.


J. Beckwith Burr
Neustar, Inc. / Deputy General Counsel and Chief Privacy Officer
1775 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20006
Office: + 1.202.533.2932  Mobile:  +1.202.352.6367  /
becky.burr at neustar.biz / www.neustar.biz






On 5/5/15, 10:34 AM, "Nigel Roberts" <nigel at channelisles.net> wrote:

>"ICANN has verbally represented that they will reject any proposed
>agreement in which ICANN is not deemed the sole source prime contractor
>for the IANA functions in perpetuity."
>
>
>If this statement, made publicly, and from a respected source, is
>literally true, aren't we all wasting our time??
>
>Surely a starting point HAS to be that we (ccTLDs) need the
>accountability that potentially the ccTLD part of IANA role could be
>moved if the current function operator does not come up to scratch?
>
>What does the CCWG think?
>
>
>Nigel Roberts
>_______________________________________________
>ccTLDcommunity mailing list
>ccTLDcommunity at cctld-managers.org
>https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.lists.cctld-2Dmana
>gers.org_mailman_listinfo_cctldcommunity&d=AwICAg&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw
>&r=62cJFOifzm6X_GRlaq8Mo8TjDmrxdYahOP8WDDkMr4k&m=4VZqWjmswnfEoPxKQ9x6B2Yq_
>v2U69H_zpJiiqcrCpk&s=UPu4q5iiJtlrv34Y13NGjaUT9GAKtgwWqQKVh4rDqGE&e=
>
>To unsubscribe please send a blank email to
>ccTLDcommunity-unsubscribe at lists.cctld-managers.org