[CCWG-ACCT] [Cctldworld] [ccTLDcommunity] ICANN transition

[Dr Eberhard Lisse]

Maybe we must take a holistic approach here.

el

On 2015-05-05 17:23, Burr, Becky wrote:
> Speaking for myself, I find all of this pretty upsetting, particularly
> since ICANN seems to be blaming the USG for this position, and my
> impression is that the USG doesn¹t share this perspective at all.
> 
> 
> J. Beckwith Burr
[...]
> 
> On 5/5/15, 10:34 AM, "Nigel Roberts" <nigel at channelisles.net> wrote:
> 
>> "ICANN has verbally represented that they will reject any proposed
>> agreement in which ICANN is not deemed the sole source prime contractor
>> for the IANA functions in perpetuity."
>>
>>
>> If this statement, made publicly, and from a respected source, is
>> literally true, aren't we all wasting our time??
>>
>> Surely a starting point HAS to be that we (ccTLDs) need the
>> accountability that potentially the ccTLD part of IANA role could be
>> moved if the current function operator does not come up to scratch?
>>
>> What does the CCWG think?
>>
>>
>> Nigel Roberts
[...]

-- 
Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse  \        / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar)
el at lisse.NA            / *     |   Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell)
PO Box 8421             \     /
Bachbrecht, Namibia     ;____/