[CCWG-ACCT] about the CCWG 30-day comment period

[Seun Ojedeji]

sent from Google nexus 4
kindly excuse brevity and typos.
On 7 May 2015 16:36, "Burr, Becky" <Becky.Burr at neustar.biz> wrote:
>
> No problem on Bruce's suggestion, but I think staff is getting a bad rap
here. We spoke about the length of the comment period on several calls, and
I think many of us saw value in analyzing comments prior to BA.  This
wasn't staff's call.
>
SO:
Absolute +1. I think we throw so much of blame at staff, forgetting that
some of issues were our call(re: accountability of the community itself).
Unfortunately customer is always right would apply to staff.

Cheers!

> Sent from my iPad
>
> > On May 6, 2015, at 9:50 PM, James M. Bladel <jbladel at godaddy.com> wrote:
> >
> > Agree with Bruce.
> >
> > J.
> >
> >> On 5/5/15, 18:03 , "Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin at melbourneit.com.au>
wrote:
> >>
> >> I think it would be worth holding the public comment forum itself open
up
> >> to and including Buenos Aires - but just note that the deadline applies
> >> with respect to responding to any of the comments in time for the
Buenos
> >> Aires meeting.
> >>
> >> I would expect for  example that we are unlikely to get GAC feedback
> >> until after their meeting in Buenos Aires.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Bruce Tonkin
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org
> >> [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of
> >> Adam Peake
> >> Sent: Wednesday, 6 May 2015 6:41 AM
> >> To: Accountability Cross Community
> >> Subject: [CCWG-ACCT] about the CCWG 30-day comment period
> >>
> >> Note on behalf of Thomas, Leon and Mathieu about the CCWG proposal
30-day
> >> public comment period.
> >>
> >> Hi everyone,
> >>
> >> We have seen comments about the 30-day public comment period.  You will
> >> remember this has been our intention since we discussed planning in
> >> Istanbul, and we concluded this discussion on the CCWG call of 30
April.
> >> The outcome was to propose the first public comment should be for 30
> >> days, which would allow time for us to prepare a response for the ICANN
> >> meeting in  Buenos Aires.  It is particularly important that we are
able
> >> to respond to the dependencies identified by the CWG-Stewardship.
> >>
> >> Recognizing that the shorter public comment is not ideal for a subject
of
> >> such importance to the community, we also took into account the fact
that
> >> we will to hold a second public comment period some weeks after ICANN53
> >> when we will seek input on any outstanding issues and provide details
and
> >> explanation prompted by discussions with the community from the first
> >> public comment and during ICANN53.
> >>
> >> The public comment announcement includes the remark "Because this
(first)
> >> Public Comment period is less than the required 40-day minimum, it has
> >> been approved by two ICANN Global Leaders."  The term Global Leaders
is a
> >> reference to senior members of the ICANN staff and the condition was
> >> created to ensure that a check existed so that a single ICANN
department
> >> would not depart from the standard default time period without broader
> >> senior staff input.  The public comment guidelines and procedures are
> >> available on the public wiki
> >>
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_pages_viewpage.action-3FpageId-3D48344695&d=AwICAg&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=62cJFOifzm6X_GRlaq8Mo8TjDmrxdYahOP8WDDkMr4k&m=LIz4XO1PtW8gPh9yOCpS5si1mBLbAIaIr9YuCN1ZmKM&s=t6g7vAwJL1PEx0ib94-2lWrsWf0sKDQSjrVBAuw_WvA&e=
> >>
> >> Warm regards,
> >>
> >> Thomas, Leon and Mathieu
> >> CCWG co-chairs
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> >> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> >>
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailman_listinfo_accountability-2Dcross-2Dcommunity&d=AwICAg&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=62cJFOifzm6X_GRlaq8Mo8TjDmrxdYahOP8WDDkMr4k&m=LIz4XO1PtW8gPh9yOCpS5si1mBLbAIaIr9YuCN1ZmKM&s=uHnDu_ktl8NP8I8VJ6YqQHtrwK8DhFWkJj98RUoKe6g&e=
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> > Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> >
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailman_listinfo_accountability-2Dcross-2Dcommunity&d=AwICAg&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=62cJFOifzm6X_GRlaq8Mo8TjDmrxdYahOP8WDDkMr4k&m=LIz4XO1PtW8gPh9yOCpS5si1mBLbAIaIr9YuCN1ZmKM&s=uHnDu_ktl8NP8I8VJ6YqQHtrwK8DhFWkJj98RUoKe6g&e=
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150507/8878a131/attachment.html>