[CCWG-ACCT] Question regarding UAs

[James M. Bladel]

Alan:

It's a good question, and I am also intrigued by the simplicity of this idea. 

J. 

Sent via iPhone. Blame Siri. 


> On May 18, 2015, at 21:19, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca> wrote:
> 
> I believe I understand the issues regarding UAs as shadow organizations for the AC/SOs. Although I still have strong reservations and am not sure we need the legal enforceability that they provide, I am willing to accept that they will work.
> 
> But I also feel that using such structures will be difficult for the overall community to understand (on an ongoing basis).
> 
> I have a simple question. Instead of having a UA and the AC/SO naming people to be their formal representatives in the UA, why can we not simply have the AC/SO Chair or their Delegate(s) be the Members or Designators. These people have legal status, so why do we need the UAs?
> 
> I will not be able to join the call in a few hours, but will listen to the recording later in the day.
> 
> Alan
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community