[CCWG-ACCT] June 9 Call - On behalf of CCWG Cochairs

[Dr Eberhard W Lisse]

Roelof,

this makes sense to me, though, I would perhaps not determine the
categories beforehand.

greetings, el

On 2015-05-21 10:23 , Roelof Meijer wrote:
> Dear co-chairs,
> 
> I am not sure that just adding an extra hour to the call would really
> help us to work with the comments in an effective and –if at all
> possible- efficient way.
> 
> I sent the following suggesting to Jordan trough the WP1 list:
> 
> I suggest that the first exercise that some of us as a sub-team do, is
> categorize the comments. Possible categories: comments on mechanisms,
> comments on powers, comments on (AoC in) bylaws etc. And that we then
> assign a category or multiple categories to subteams to do both the
> analysis and the initial thinking of a way forward. In this way, not all
> of us will have to go through all the comments, we can do a lot of work
> in a relatively short timespan and if the subteams present at the F2F
> sessions, those can be quite effective.
> How does that sound?
> 
> 
> Groet,
> 
> Roelof
> 
> From: Alice Jansen <alice.jansen at icann.org <mailto:alice.jansen at icann.org>>
> Date: woensdag 20 mei 2015 17:19
> To: "accountability-cross-community at icann.org
> <mailto:accountability-cross-community at icann.org>"
> <accountability-cross-community at icann.org
> <mailto:accountability-cross-community at icann.org>>
> Subject: [CCWG-ACCT] June 9 Call - On behalf of CCWG Cochairs
> 
> _On behalf of CCWG Cochairs_
> _
> _
> Dear all,
> 
> Following up on the suggestion made on call #33 that the full Group
> should review public comments received on a call, we would like to
> suggest dedicating the CCWG call scheduled for Tuesday, 9 June to this task.
> This call will be an opportunity for us to identify sections of the
> draft proposal where the community 1) is in agreement; 2) needs
> clarification; 3) has diverging opinions.
> To provide us with sufficient time to review all comments, we have
> decided to extend the call duration to three hours. Staff will adjust
> the calendar invite accordingly.
> As a reminder, public comments received to date can be found at:
> http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-ccwg-accountability-draft-proposal-04may15/
>   
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Best regards
> 
> Mathieu, Thomas, León
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
> 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4198 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150521/6141da32/smime.p7s>