[CCWG-ACCT] June 9 Call - On behalf of CCWG Cochairs

[Roelof Meijer]

Possibly I am alone here, but I don’t share that opinion. Of course, if we receive only a handful of comments, that will work.
But if we get a lot (which is what I hope), it probably won’t.  And I don’t feel the need at all to be part of the analysis of all comments. I have more than enough trust and faith in my fellow members/participants to share the work between us

Best,

Roelof

From: Thomas Rickert <rickert at anwaelte.de<mailto:rickert at anwaelte.de>>
Date: donderdag 21 mei 2015 11:29
To: Roelof Meijer <roelof.meijer at sidn.nl<mailto:roelof.meijer at sidn.nl>>
Cc: Alice Jansen <alice.jansen at icann.org<mailto:alice.jansen at icann.org>>, Accountability Cross Community <accountability-cross-community at icann.org<mailto:accountability-cross-community at icann.org>>
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] June 9 Call - On behalf of CCWG Cochairs

Avri suggested (rightfully) that the analysis of comments should not be done by subgroups, but by the whole group.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150522/67111f9f/attachment.html>