[CCWG-ACCT] June 9 Call - On behalf of CCWG Cochairs

[Dr Eberhard W Lisse]

Dear Co-Chairs,

as you know I am all for decision making taking place in the plenum,
and not in sub teams, but this response below sounds to me a little
like Thomas is worried about loosing control over the (perhaps) many
sub teams.

Curioser and curioser...

el

On 2015-05-21 10:29 , Thomas Rickert wrote:
> Dear Roelof,
> we will have considerable preparatory work done when the so called
> "public comment review tool“, a document in which all comments
> go, is populated.
> 
> Avri suggested (rightfully) that the analysis of comments should
> not be done by subgroups, but by the whole group.
> 
> We will do what we can in order to group comments by subject and
> identify duplicate comments so we use the CCWG’s time in the
> most efficient way.
> 
> Ideally, we should not need the whole 3 hours, but we felt that we
> should make sure everyone is prepared we might need more than the
> usual 2 hours.  Also, we thought this would be less of a burden
> for all than needing two calls for the exercise (although I
> caution that this might still be needed in case we get too many
> comments).
> 
> Finally, please note the whole group will not find solutions to
> the comments, but go through them and allocate them to sub-groups
> where action needs to be taken.
> 
> I hope this helps.
> 
> Best,
> Thomas
[...]

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4198 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150521/61eda5ee/smime.p7s>