[CCWG-ACCT] June 9 Call - On behalf of CCWG Cochairs

[Thomas Rickert]

Dear Eberhard,
what makes you believe that I am worried (which I am not)? I cannot find anything in my e-mail suggesting that.

Maybe you can help me so I do not find your intervention as curious as I currently do.

Thomas



> Am 21.05.2015 um 11:40 schrieb Dr Eberhard W Lisse <el at lisse.na>:
> 
> Dear Co-Chairs,
> 
> as you know I am all for decision making taking place in the plenum,
> and not in sub teams, but this response below sounds to me a little
> like Thomas is worried about loosing control over the (perhaps) many
> sub teams.
> 
> Curioser and curioser...
> 
> el
> 
> On 2015-05-21 10:29 , Thomas Rickert wrote:
>> Dear Roelof,
>> we will have considerable preparatory work done when the so called
>> "public comment review tool“, a document in which all comments
>> go, is populated.
>> 
>> Avri suggested (rightfully) that the analysis of comments should
>> not be done by subgroups, but by the whole group.
>> 
>> We will do what we can in order to group comments by subject and
>> identify duplicate comments so we use the CCWG’s time in the
>> most efficient way.
>> 
>> Ideally, we should not need the whole 3 hours, but we felt that we
>> should make sure everyone is prepared we might need more than the
>> usual 2 hours.  Also, we thought this would be less of a burden
>> for all than needing two calls for the exercise (although I
>> caution that this might still be needed in case we get too many
>> comments).
>> 
>> Finally, please note the whole group will not find solutions to
>> the comments, but go through them and allocate them to sub-groups
>> where action needs to be taken.
>> 
>> I hope this helps.
>> 
>> Best,
>> Thomas
> [...]
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 496 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150521/c7a010ac/signature.asc>