[CCWG-ACCT] interplay between 'old' and 'new' IRPs

[Jacob Malthouse]

I have a question about old and new IRPs. Old being the many currently
active (notably taking up way more panelists than this group's proposal
affords on the standing panel) and how they would relate to a new standing
panel.

If the .Africa appeal drags on for example into a second IRP (as it looks
like booking.com will), eventually a new appeals system will be put in
place.

I'd expect you could then launch a fresh appeal (third IRP) to that new
panel because it is basically a new court, presumably followed by a fourth
appeal of the appeal.

So that's a total of four IRPs for .Africa before going to the courts.

Has any thought gone into how this would work (or not?).

Best, J.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150521/58c0e406/attachment.html>