[CCWG-ACCT] Fwd: Kavouss alternative proposal

Paul Rosenzweig paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com
Sat Sep 26 21:04:15 UTC 2015


Dare I say +1 to Dr. L?  Perhaps a first for me!
--
Paul
Sent from myMail app for Android Saturday, 26 September 2015, 02:52PM -04:00 from Dr Eberhard W Lisse < el at lisse.NA> :

>Dear Co-Chairs,
>
>I think I have read the proposal very carefully, hence my summary.
>
>If I were into ICANNnese (languagewise) I would "share my
>understanding" as this proposal imposes so many and high burdens to
>be met that the mechanism it proposes would never trigger.
>
>That said, I am, as ever, impressed by the skills displayed by the
>proposer :-)-O
>
>el
>
>On 2015-09-26 09:43 , Kavouss Arasteh wrote:
>> Dear All
>> There is community mechanism through standing Panel
>> Pls  kindly read the text more carefully
>> Kavousd 
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>>> On 26 Sep 2015, at 09:32, Dr Eberhard W Lisse < el at lisse.NA > wrote:
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>>
>>> in short that means, there will be no Community Mechanism.
>>>
>>> el
>>>
>>>> On 2015-09-26 09:13 , Jordan Carter wrote:
>>>> here is the PDF of Kavouss' suggestion.
>>>>
>>>> Jordan
>>> [...]
>
>_______________________________________________
>Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150927/cb59553e/attachment.html>


More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list