[CCWG-ACCT] Disagreement on wrong interpretation of a qualifier

[León Felipe Sánchez Ambía]

Dear Kavouss,

I cannot jump into concluding that there is any kind of pre-arrangement against your views.

The fact that as you state “others had no comments” was what led me to believe there was no traction to the issue and hence I suggested taking it to the list.


Best regards,


León

> El 12/04/2016, a las 8:51 a.m., Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com> escribió:
> 
> Dear Leon
> Tks
> Having no traction was due to lineup ?pre arrangement of those talked against me
> Others had no comments
> Regards
> Kavouss
> 
> 2016-04-12 15:40 GMT+02:00 León Felipe Sánchez Ambía <leonfelipe at sanchez.mx <mailto:leonfelipe at sanchez.mx>>:
> Dear Kavouss,
> 
> I am sorry you feel that way. As you know, our duty as Co-Chairs is to try to facilitate the discussion amongst all members and participants in our group.
> 
> I am aware that you have expressed your disagreement with Mr. Shatan’s views in several occasions but I am also aware that, to the best of my knowledge, your disagreement has found no traction in the discussion in the meeting you are referring to, hence I thought the best way to foster and encourage discussion on the issue was to take it to the list.
> 
> I apologize if my suggestion offended you or if it was perceived as being disrespectful. Of course I didn’t mean it that way at all.
> 
> I trust you will understand why I suggested to take the discussion to the list and thank you for your kind observation.
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> 
> León
> 
> > El 12/04/2016, a las 6:54 a.m., Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com <mailto:kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>> escribió:
> >
> > Dear Leon
> > I am disappointed and frustrated by the reaction of some Co-Chairs in conducting the meeting .
> > I had a disagreement with Mr. Satan of IPC on the above subject
> > Due to the closed link between that person and   other  persons belonging  to the same camp, you did not agreed with the argument that I submitted .
> > Mr.Satan and his camp , wrong views were taken BUT what disturbed me more was your statement in saying" kavouss,if you want to continue thus discussion,continue on nailing list"
> > Why should I do that?
> > What was the usefulness of the meeting if an important issue should be discussed outside the call?
> > Why I was treated ?
> > .
> > Kavousd
> > Sent from my iPhone
> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160412/9cb5c0b2/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 842 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160412/9cb5c0b2/signature.asc>