[CCWG-ACCT] Disagreement on wrong interpretation of a qualifier

Wed Apr 13 02:40:05 UTC 2016

I agree Greg. We must respect each other, without aggression.

Best regards

Alberto Soto

De: accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] En nombre de Greg Shatan
Enviado el: martes, 12 de abril de 2016 11:50 a.m.
Para: León Felipe Sánchez Ambía <leonfelipe at sanchez.mx>
CC: Thomas Rickert <thomas at rickert.net>; Accountability Cross Community <accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
Asunto: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Disagreement on wrong interpretation of a qualifier

I can state with absolute truthfulness and certainty that there was no pre-alignment or pre-arrangement. I resent the allegation and I'm disappointed in the thinking underlying such a  statement.

People agreed with me because they shared my opinion, which is not in any way intended to be US-centric.  If this were a UK-law document, I would say the same thing -- that we should use terms commonly used and with settled meanings under UK law.  I think it's a common sense position.

Can we get back to business and avoid hatching conspiracy theories?  Such thinking is below the standard set by my esteemed colleague from Iran.

Greg 😈

On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 9:54 AM, León Felipe Sánchez Ambía <leonfelipe at sanchez.mx <mailto:leonfelipe at sanchez.mx> > wrote:

Dear Kavouss,

I cannot jump into concluding that there is any kind of pre-arrangement against your views.

The fact that as you state “others had no comments” was what led me to believe there was no traction to the issue and hence I suggested taking it to the list.

Best regards,

León

El 12/04/2016, a las 8:51 a.m., Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com <mailto:kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com> > escribió:

Dear Leon

Tks

Having no traction was due to lineup ?pre arrangement of those talked against me 

Others had no comments

Regards

Kavouss 

2016-04-12 15:40 GMT+02:00 León Felipe Sánchez Ambía <leonfelipe at sanchez.mx <mailto:leonfelipe at sanchez.mx> >:

Dear Kavouss,

I am sorry you feel that way. As you know, our duty as Co-Chairs is to try to facilitate the discussion amongst all members and participants in our group.

I am aware that you have expressed your disagreement with Mr. Shatan’s views in several occasions but I am also aware that, to the best of my knowledge, your disagreement has found no traction in the discussion in the meeting you are referring to, hence I thought the best way to foster and encourage discussion on the issue was to take it to the list.

I apologize if my suggestion offended you or if it was perceived as being disrespectful. Of course I didn’t mean it that way at all.

I trust you will understand why I suggested to take the discussion to the list and thank you for your kind observation.

Best regards,

León

> El 12/04/2016, a las 6:54 a.m., Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com <mailto:kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com> > escribió:
>
> Dear Leon
> I am disappointed and frustrated by the reaction of some Co-Chairs in conducting the meeting .
> I had a disagreement with Mr. Satan of IPC on the above subject
> Due to the closed link between that person and   other  persons belonging  to the same camp, you did not agreed with the argument that I submitted .
> Mr.Satan and his camp , wrong views were taken BUT what disturbed me more was your statement in saying" kavouss,if you want to continue thus discussion,continue on nailing list"
> Why should I do that?
> What was the usefulness of the meeting if an important issue should be discussed outside the call?
> Why I was treated ?
> .
> Kavousd
> Sent from my iPhone

_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org> 
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community

This email has been protected by YAC (Yet Another Cleaner) http://www.yac.mx
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160412/e33b7c51/attachment.html>