[CCWG-ACCT] .Africa Preliminary Injunction

[Nigel Roberts]

Courts are fairly adept at divining the public interest.

ICANN is not a legislature.

As we have seen, the hubris that ICANN can simply exist in a vacuum is 
clearly false.

Just because Jones Day, this WG or Uncle Tom Cobley and all define black 
to be white, means Bill Adams** as far as the judicial system is 
concerned; and they will continue to draw on several hundred years of 
experience in this area . .





Nigel

(** Bill Adams, or 'BA' was a Great War euphemism for "bugger all")


On 13/04/16 17:10, Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez G. wrote:
> Do we already have ICANN official public interest definition? Or are we
> still in the process of finding it?
>
> Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
> +506 8837 7176
> Skype: carlos.raulg
> Current UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica)
> On 13 Apr 2016, at 10:03, Nigel Roberts wrote:
>
>> The 'public interest' is exactly what it says.. The global public.
>>
>> He refers SPECIFICALLY to the African internet users' public interest
>> in the judgment.
>>
>>
>> As follows:
>>
>>> On balance, the Court finds it more prejudicial to
>>> the African community, and the international community in general, if
>>> the delegation of .Africa is made
>>> prior to a determination on the fairness of the process by which it
>>> was delegated.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>