[CCWG-ACCT] .Africa Preliminary Injunction

[Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez G.]

@Nigel +1

Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
+506 8837 7176
Skype: carlos.raulg
Current UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica)
On 13 Apr 2016, at 10:31, Nigel Roberts wrote:

> Courts are fairly adept at divining the public interest.
>
> ICANN is not a legislature.
>
> As we have seen, the hubris that ICANN can simply exist in a vacuum is 
> clearly false.
>
> Just because Jones Day, this WG or Uncle Tom Cobley and all define 
> black to be white, means Bill Adams** as far as the judicial system is 
> concerned; and they will continue to draw on several hundred years of 
> experience in this area . .
>
>
>
>
>
> Nigel
>
> (** Bill Adams, or 'BA' was a Great War euphemism for "bugger all")
>
>
> On 13/04/16 17:10, Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez G. wrote:
>> Do we already have ICANN official public interest definition? Or are 
>> we
>> still in the process of finding it?
>>
>> Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
>> +506 8837 7176
>> Skype: carlos.raulg
>> Current UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica)
>> On 13 Apr 2016, at 10:03, Nigel Roberts wrote:
>>
>>> The 'public interest' is exactly what it says.. The global public.
>>>
>>> He refers SPECIFICALLY to the African internet users' public 
>>> interest
>>> in the judgment.
>>>
>>>
>>> As follows:
>>>
>>>> On balance, the Court finds it more prejudicial to
>>>> the African community, and the international community in general, 
>>>> if
>>>> the delegation of .Africa is made
>>>> prior to a determination on the fairness of the process by which it
>>>> was delegated.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>>