[CCWG-ACCT] CCWG report stability and implementation (was Re: inconsistency in bylaws spotted)

Greg Shatan gregshatanipc at gmail.com
Tue Apr 26 17:29:07 UTC 2016


That's why I've suggested the bylaws text be fixed....

On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com>
wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 01:22:46PM -0400, Greg Shatan wrote:
> > I've replied to this point on the original thread.  In short, my proposal
> > does not change the report.  If anything, the current proposed bylaws
> text
> > changes the report by implying that a higher level of approval for the
> FOI
> > was intended, when that was not the intent of the group or the proposal.
>
> In which case, the bylaw text needs to be fixed, which was my main
> point.  I think that's the key: that there be exact alignment between
> the report and what the bylaws say, even if we conclude now that the
> resulting bylaw has side effects we don't like.
>
> A
>
> --
> Andrew Sullivan
> ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160426/d2018ec3/attachment.html>


More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list