[CCWG-ACCT] Recommendation 11, 2/3 board threshold, GAC consensus, and finishing

[Eric (Maule) Brunner-Williams]

Mr. Rosenzweig,

Your initial remark, which I assumed was not in jest, was that the GAC
had interfered.

I assume you'd like to convey to others what that interference was.

If you could identify the act of interference that would be helpful.

Eric Brunner-Williams
Eugene, Oregon

> 
> As I said before, perhaps not clearly enough for you, I have no view on the
> matter.  The IRP (that you seem to want to ignore) did, however, have a
> view.  I would not want to attempt to summarize it for fear of not doing it
> justice.  Indeed, the entire opinion is worth reading.  If you read that and
> do not think that the IRP concluded that GAC had acted improperly, so be it
> ... but no fair reading of the opinion could interpret it that way.
> 
>