[CCWG-ACCT] Time to make a decision (was Re: Responses to Rafael's Questions)

Dr Eberhard W Lisse epilisse at gmail.com
Sun Feb 7 07:06:11 UTC 2016



I was asked to to it right. Implicitly by being appointed to this CCWG Accountability.

And I feel it is as legitimate to look out for the smaller ccTLDs' interests as for business' or governments'.

If ICANN's processes are effective or not. I know they have never been and are not. 

But that does not mean the end justifies the means.


Sent from Dr Lisse's iPad mini 4

> On 7 Feb 2016, at 08:33, Andrew Sullivan <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 07:59:18AM +0200, Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
>> Yeah, right, toss all accountability, make it happen.
>> Not.
> Really?
> What's your leverage?  Suppose that this CCWG does not deliver next
> week, such that there is a report that can be adopted by the chatering
> organizations no later that Marrakech.
> In that case, what reason does the board have to adopt even one
> resolution making any of the proposed changes?
> If your answer is, "Too much pent up demand," then explain to me how
> the same demand doesn't lead the rest of the interested world to
> decide ICANN is too broken to be reformed, and to route around the
> damage it represents.
> We are no longer free to fail and be ignored.  Either we deliver, or
> ICANN's internal processes are revealed to be fruitlessly ineffective.
> Let's not pretend.
> Best regards,
> A
> -- 
> Andrew Sullivan
> ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community

More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list