[CCWG-ACCT] Request for Clarification on Threshold Issue

Nigel Roberts nigel at channelisles.net
Mon Feb 29 22:31:54 UTC 2016


Then shouldn't we stop with the post facto relitigation?

Or as our American colleagues put it: "Monday morning quarterbacking".



On 29/02/16 21:58, Thomas Rickert wrote:
> Hi Nigel.
>>
>> "Does the Draft Final Report that was transmitted to the COs several days ago accurately represent the agreed work product of the CCWG?"
>>
>> That question has a binary answer.
>>
>
> The answer is yes.
>
> Thomas
>
>
>> It seems to me that discussion continues on further modifications or amendment to it.
>>
>> Is my understanding correct?
>>
>>
>> On 29/02/16 18:39, Salaets, Ken wrote:
>>> r now, perhaps the previous vote should be revisited.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>


More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list