[CCWG-ACCT] Recommendation 12 - work stream 2 - 1st reading conclusions

Kavouss Arasteh kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
Wed Jan 6 23:45:23 UTC 2016

Dear All,
The situation on how the formal comments from chartering organizations
would be considred and taken into account is not clear.
The deadline is 22 January.
Consequently we MUST WAIT untgil the deadline is expired ,in taking into
account the comments then conclude on each recommendations

2016-01-06 23:26 GMT+01:00 Robin Gross <robin at ipjustice.org>:

> Several comments in the public comment period called for a specific WS2
> transparency issue of “transparency over board deliberations”.  NCSG was
> among those commenters.  How do we include the views of those who’s
> comments weren’t taken into account in the document / discussion for 1st
> reading on Rec. 12 in yesterday’s call?   The GNSO’s comments don’t come in
> until next week, so how will they be incorporated into Rec. 12 if we’ve
> already done the 2 readings before we’ve even seen the GNSO view on Rec.
> 12?  It looks like only the board’s concerns were reflected in the document
> / discussion for the 1st reading of Rec #12.  How do we include other
> stakeholder concerns in these discussions?
> Thanks,
> Robin
> > On Jan 6, 2016, at 6:02 AM, Mathieu Weill <Mathieu.Weill at afnic.fr>
> wrote:
> >
> > <Formatted-Annex 12-PROOFED-1stREAD.pdf>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160107/0599cb84/attachment.html>

More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list