[CCWG-ACCT] CCWG WS2 Next Steps

[Jordan Carter]

I know it's late and past the deadline, but I would like to join Avri in
helping with staff accountability if that's viable.

Speak with you all soon,

Jordan

On Tuesday, 12 July 2016, Karen Mulberry <karen.mulberry at icann.org> wrote:

> Sent on behalf of the CCWG-Acct Co-Chairs
>
>
> CCWG WS2 Next Steps
>
> Now that we have outlined the WS2 workplan as part of the discussion in
> Helsinki, there are various areas where additional follow up will be needed
> as the subgroups get underway.
>
> Please note that the Subgroup sign up Google Doc will be closed as of 12
> July 2016, to sign up as either an active participant or an observer in any
> of the Subgroups going forward please send your request to ACCT-Staff (
> acct-staff at icann.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','acct-staff at icann.org');>).
>
> WS2 SUBGROUPS
>
> The following timeline was presented in Helsinki with the work divided
> into two approaches.  Simple topics are anticipated to be short term and
> should be able to reach consensus quickly with a Public Comment period
> planned for October 2016 and the final output to be presented at the ICANN
> meeting in Copenhagen.  The more complex topics will take longer to develop
> and as such will provide an update on the progress of the subgroup’s work
> in Copenhagen, with the final report expected to be delivered in June 2017.
> An early indication from the Subgroup Rapporteurs as to whether their topic
> is on the simple timeline or the complex timeline would be useful so that
> the CCWG can plan its work to enable full participation in the subgroups of
> interest for each participant.
>
> Helsinki Timeline - Simple Topics – Short Term
> • June 2016: sub-groups agreed, commence work on docs for public input
> • Aug 2016: first discussion with CCWG
> • Sep 2016: refining work
> • Oct 2016: CCWG agrees for public input
> • 20 Oct-30 Nov: Public Input comment period
> • Dec 2016: Analyze public comment staff/subgroups
> • Jan 2017: Sub-groups refines and revises output
> • Feb 2017: CCWG agrees final Output for consideration by community FOR
> ADOPTION at Copenhagen
>
> Helsinki Timeline - Complex Topics – Intermediate/Long Term
> • Jun 2016: sub-groups agreed
> • Sep-Oct 2016: first discussion with CCWG - identifies whether and how
> to update community at Hyderabad
> • Nov-Dec 2016: second discussion with CCWG (first SUBSTANTIVE)
> • Jan 2017: refining work
> • Feb 2017: CCWG agrees docs for public input
> • 1 Mar to 10 Apr: Public Input comment period
> • Apr 2017: Analyze public comment staff/subgroups
> • May 2017: Sub-groups refines and revises output
> • May/Jun 2017: CCWG agrees final Output for consideration by community
>
> SUBTEAM LEADERSHIP
>
> The following have indicated that they wish to be rapporteurs for WS2
> topics.
>
> • Diversity - Fiona Asonga, Rafik Dammak
> • Human Rights - Niels ten Oever, Nigel Roberts, Paul McGrady
> • Jurisdiction - Greg Shatan, Vinay Kesari
> • Ombudsman - Sebastien Bacholet
> • SO/AC Acct - Cheryl Langdon-Orr, Farzaneh Badii, Steve DelBianco
> • Staff Acct. - Avri Doria
> • Transparency - Michael Karanicolas
> • Reviewing CEP - Ed Morris
> • Guidelines for standards of conduct presumed to be in good faith
> associated with exercising removal of individual ICANN Board Directors -
> Lori Schulman
>
> Designated rapporteurs will need to reaffirm their time commitment,
> including the meeting time to work with the CCWG leadership team in
> preparatory and post drafting of their recommendations and reports.
>
> SUBGROUP DELIVERABLES
>
> Each subgroup is expected to deliver a report of its findings and
> recommendations to the CCWG Plenary for discussion and consensus.  Periodic
> updates on the work of each subgroup will need to be provided by the
> Rapporteurs during CCWG Plenary sessions to track progress.
>
> The expectation is that the output reports and recommendations will look
> like an Annex of the Work Stream 1 report. The structure is an executive
> summary; a description of the issue, including the description of the
> current state of play and incorporation of the discussions and inputs
> received from the Work Stream 1 effort, the supplemental report; and a
> section describing the requirements for the recommendation and how the
> recommendation has been validated against WS1 recommendations. The report
> and recommendation will also need to include text to demonstrate how the
> subgroups recommendations are meeting what was previously known as the NTIA
> requirements.
>
> Each subgroup needs to be careful to demonstrate that they are conducting
> the due diligence needed in meeting the NTIA criteria with each and every
> one of its recommendations and requirements.  These requirements will then
> be translated into specific Bylaw articles after CCWG plenary discussion
> and consensus and a Public Comment period has been held on the CCWG
> recommendations.
>
> SUBGROUP SCHEDULING
>
> Staff can support up to nine (9), one hour meeting slots per week, which
> will be available for the WS2 subgroup Rapporteurs to work together to
> select their group’s meeting dates and times.
>
> The weekly 1-hour available slots for July and August will be as follows:
> • three (3) slots at 05:00 UTC,
> • three (3) slots at 13:00 UTC
> • three (3) slots at 20:00 UTC
>
> The timing of the available slots will be reconsidered at the end of
> August so adjustments can be made, if necessary.  However the nine (9)
> weekly one (1) hour slots will remain consistent in order for ICANN staff
> to support the work of all the subgroups with no more than three (3) slots
> to occur on any one day of the week.
>
>
> *Karen Mulberry*
> Director
> Multistakeholder Strategy and Strategic Initiatives
> ICANN
>
>
>

-- 
Jordan Carter
Chief Executive, InternetNZ

+64-21-442-649 | jordan at internetnz.net.nz

Sent on the run, apologies for brevity
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160713/da476e9f/attachment-0001.html>