[CCWG-ACCT] Proposed Agenda CCWG ACCT Meeting - 12 July 2016 @ 20:00 UTC

matthew shears mshears at cdt.org
Wed Jul 13 19:28:52 UTC 2016


Completely agree with Greg.


On 13/07/2016 19:58, Greg Shatan wrote:
> I object, and I think many others objected, to the idea that advice 
> from inhouse (i.e., ICANN legal) should be the "default."  We retained 
> independent counsel to the CCWG for good reasons, and those reasons 
> are still applicable today.  I hope we don't need to rehash that.
>
> We need the continued ability and discretion to go directly to CCWG's 
> counsel. Requesting inhouse to solicit an opinion from an external 
> counsel is not only "cumbersome," it's absolutely antithetical to the 
> relationship between CCWG and its independent counsel.
>
> I strongly believe that the "default" must be the status quo, i.e., 
> that the CCWG (through reasonable processes) has the ability and 
> discretion to turn to its own counsel.  Further, I strongly believe 
> that CCWG's independent counsel must remain Sidley Austin and Adler & 
> Colvin.  They have been up a tremendous learning curve and worked with 
> us every step of the way.  It would be folly to cast that aside.  It's 
> worth noting that Sidley is a full-service law firm with offices 
> outside the US in Beijing, Brussels, Geneva, Hong Kong, London, 
> Munich, Shanghai, Singapore, Sydney and Tokyo.  I'm confident that 
> Sidley (and Adler) will (a) tell us when they don't have the expertise 
> to help us, and (b) work with us on working methods to make our use of 
> the firms more cost-effective.
>
> Greg
>
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 9:22 PM, Rudolph Daniel <rudi.daniel at gmail.com 
> <mailto:rudi.daniel at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Based on comments on the call today, IMO; A good body of knowledge
>     was accquired on the subject of legal requests in wg1. WG2 legal
>     resources would be both inhouse and external, from start, We
>     should be much more efficient this time around. Each sub however
>     will have their needs and there may be requests applicable across
>     the subgroups and/or specific to a subgroup.
>     So, that suggests close relationship between budget control and
>     the former legal request team [reconfigured and/or augmented] who
>     would have to coordinate requests across ws2 sub
>     groups as i see it.
>     What determines the initial choice inhouse/external resources may
>     be a matter of consensus, but it may be prudent to consider the
>     process as [default] inhouse with the flexible and necessary
>     option of external sources by consensus [as the fog clears so to
>     speak]. I think it may be cumbersome to request inhouse to solicit
>     an opinion from an external,  because there may arise an instance
>     where; on the strength of an opinion, [inhouse or external] ; a
>     wg2 may wish to reframe and seek alternative advise elswhere.
>     rd
>
>
>
>     Rudi Daniel
>     /danielcharles consulting
>     <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Kingstown-Saint-Vincent-and-the-Grenadines/DanielCharles/153611257984774>/
>     *
>     *
>
>
>     On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 7:21 PM, Vinay Kesari
>     <vinay.kesari at gmail.com <mailto:vinay.kesari at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>         Dear all,
>
>         I was unfortunately unable to join the call as I was on a
>         flight at the time, my apologies. I've just had a chance to
>         catch up on the Adobe Connect recording, and I'm happy to
>         reconfirm my willingness and availability to serve as a
>         rapporteur. Also, I agree with the thrust of Kavouss' comment
>         at 0:24:30, and affirm my commitment to serve impartially. I
>         look forward to working with Greg on the jurisdiction subgroup.
>
>         Separately, on the issue of allocation of legal requests, I
>         agree that we need further discussion, and endorse creating an
>         Option 3 based on the points made and the specific
>         requirements of the different WS2 subgroups.
>
>         Regards,
>         Vinay
>
>
>         On 12 July 2016 at 20:55, Mathieu Weill
>         <mathieu.weill at afnic.fr <mailto:mathieu.weill at afnic.fr>> wrote:
>
>             Dear Colleagues,
>
>             Attached is a short set of slides to support our
>             discussion on agenda item #4
>
>             Talk to you in a few hours
>
>             Mathieu
>
>             *De :*accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org
>             <mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org>
>             [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org
>             <mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org>]
>             *De la part de* MSSI Secretariat
>             *Envoyé :* lundi 11 juillet 2016 19:46
>             *À :* CCWG-Accountability
>             *Objet :* [CCWG-ACCT] Proposed Agenda CCWG ACCT Meeting -
>             12 July 2016 @ 20:00 UTC
>
>             Good day all,
>
>             In preparation for your call, CCWG Accountability WS2
>             Meeting #2<https://community.icann.org/x/FyOOAw>– Tuesday,
>             12 July @ 20:00 – 22:00 UTC.  Time zone converter here
>             <http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=CCWG+Accountability+Meeting&iso=20160712T20&p1=1440&ah=2>
>
>             *Proposed Agenda:*
>
>             1. Welcome, SOI
>
>             2. Articles of Incorporation : finalize submission
>
>             3. Appointment of rapporteurs for WS2 – next steps
>
>             4. Legal Cost Control Mechanism : initial discussion
>
>             5. AOB
>
>             6. Closing
>
>             *Adobe Connect:
>             *https://icann.adobeconnect.com/accountability/
>
>             Thank you!
>
>             With kind regards,
>
>             Brenda Brewer
>
>             MSSI Projects & Operations Assistant
>
>             ICANN-**Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers
>
>
>             _______________________________________________
>             Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>             Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>             <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
>             https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>         Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>         <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
>         https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>     Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>     <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
>     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community

-- 

--------------
Matthew Shears
Global Internet Policy and Human Rights
Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT)
+ 44 771 2472987



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160713/bd6fd3d4/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 92 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160713/bd6fd3d4/attachment-0001.gif>


More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list