[CCWG-ACCT] Proposed Agenda CCWG ACCT Meeting - 12 July 2016 @ 20:00 UTC

[John Curran]

On Jul 14, 2016, at 5:53 PM, Drazek, Keith <kdrazek at verisign.com> wrote:
> 
> Agreed. Access to independent legal advice was never in question.
>  
> That said, in the interest of controlling costs, I have no problem seeking input from ICANN’s internal lawyers on issues that are deemed non-contentious or where potential conflicts do not exist.
> 

Keith - 
 
    That is my view as well - no concerns with using the most-cost effective
    approach in the normal course of business, so long as that does not
    preclude access to independent counsel when requested by the CCWG.

/John

Disclaimers: my views alone - Accountability CCWG individual participant  

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160715/86cfb063/attachment.html>