[CCWG-ACCT] Proposed Agenda CCWG ACCT Meeting - 12 July 2016 @ 20:00 UTC

[Rudolph Daniel]

yes John, agree.
rd


Rudi Daniel
*danielcharles consulting
<http://www.facebook.com/pages/Kingstown-Saint-Vincent-and-the-Grenadines/DanielCharles/153611257984774>*



On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 7:43 AM, John Curran <jcurran at istaff.org> wrote:

> On Jul 14, 2016, at 5:53 PM, Drazek, Keith <kdrazek at verisign.com> wrote:
>
>
> Agreed. Access to independent legal advice was never in question.
>
> That said, in the interest of controlling costs, I have no problem seeking
> input from ICANN’s internal lawyers on issues that are deemed
> non-contentious or where potential conflicts do not exist.
>
>
> Keith -
>
>     That is my view as well - no concerns with using the most-cost
> effective
>     approach in the normal course of business, so long as that does not
>     preclude access to independent counsel when requested by the CCWG.
>
> /John
>
> Disclaimers: my views alone - Accountability CCWG individual participant
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160715/a0c00f5c/attachment.html>