[CCWG-ACCT] The whois/RDS-RT bylaw vs. current activities

[Kavouss Arasteh]

Dear Andrew,
Yes and NO
if we wish to short cut and /or economize a PDP process COULD be equivalent
/replace of a RT.
Regards
Kavouss

2016-04-28 15:12 GMT+02:00 Andrew Sullivan <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com>:

> Hi,
>
> In thinking about the way the bylaws require the regular RTs and how
> those might interact with other processes, I'm wondering whether we
> think it would be consistent with the report to say that, if a PDP is
> going on about any topic that is subject to regular RT, then the PDP
> can be counted as fulfilling the purposes of the RT?
>
> It seems to me that this is consistent with the point of the regular
> RT requirement (i.e. ensuring that the review happens in a timely way)
> without entailing that we waste time, money, and energy in multiple,
> potentially conflicting efforts on the same topic.
>
> Have I missed something?
>
> Best regards,
>
> A
>
> --
> Andrew Sullivan
> ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160501/98b5eb0a/attachment-0001.html>