[CCWG-ACCT] TR: Rationale Requirement in Annex D, Section 2.2(c)(i)(A)

[Seun Ojedeji]

On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 2:06 PM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com>
wrote:

> On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 01:26:36PM +0100, Malcolm Hutty wrote:
> > What if the reason for rejecting the budget/plan is that ICANN failed to
> > hold a public comment period?
>
> That seems like it'd be a pretty good rationale to me.  No?
>
> Yes it is but there would have been no opportunity to submit it to public
comment. I guess that was the point Malcom was trying to make (unless i
missed his point)

Cheers!


> A
>
> --
> Andrew Sullivan
> ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>



-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------





*Seun Ojedeji,Federal University Oye-Ekitiweb:      http://www.fuoye.edu.ng
<http://www.fuoye.edu.ng> Mobile: +2348035233535**alt email:
<http://goog_1872880453>seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng
<seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng>*

Bringing another down does not take you up - think about your action!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160504/3c51df8e/attachment.html>