[CCWG-ACCT] latest letter from Cruz et al FYI

[Kavouss Arasteh]

Dear Nigel,
Being used to your ability to argue for any term, the so-called Invention
of DNS (

2016-05-22 18:18 GMT+02:00 Nigel Roberts <nigel at channelisles.net>:

> It's not a problem. I understood the intention.
>
> The difference is that the DNS *WAS* invented, not discovered however.
>
> And invention can certainly create property rights.
>
> As -- in US and common-law countries -- a representation coupled with
> reliance thereupon.
>
>
>
> On 22/05/16 16:16, Arasteh wrote:
>
>> Dear All
>> Sorry for inattention using " invented" I correct it to be " discovered"
>> Regards
>> Kavouss
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On 22 May 2016, at 15:48, Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
>> <mailto:kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Dear All,
>>> I hesitate to comment on the letter sent but  looking at the messages
>>> exchanged, I wish to briefly comment in an individual capacity ( A
>>> CCWG participant only ) as follows
>>> 1. The analysis made by the authors of the letter were made with some
>>> degree of partiality and with lack of full understanding of the process .
>>> 2. As for the issue of "DNS Property" the attention of the authors are
>>> drawn to the fact that , DNS like  ORIBITAL/ SPECTRUM RESOURCES are
>>> natural resources and does not belong to anybody. It can be used by
>>> any applicant under certain Rule and procedure .Therefore there is no
>>> ownership on DNS at all.
>>> It is evident that the internet has been mostly initiated by and from
>>> a given country but it does not mean that such country is the owner of
>>> the DNS. While It belongs to no body, it belongs to everybody.
>>> The inventor of the electromagnetic waves and the countries in which
>>> the issue was developed has never ever claimed to be the owner of the
>>> spectrum .
>>> Kavouss
>>>
>>> 2016-05-22 13:35 GMT+02:00 Nigel Roberts <nigel at channelisles.net
>>> <mailto:nigel at channelisles.net>>:
>>>
>>>     I'm content to discuss it here - I was merely offering to take the
>>>     discussion aside in case it was seen as off-topic (which is isn't,
>>>     IMO, that much).
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>     On 22/05/16 11:36, Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
>>>
>>>         on Act.
>>>
>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>     Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>>>     Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>>>     <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
>>>     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>>>
>>>
>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160522/65270204/attachment-0001.html>