[CCWG-ACCT] latest letter from Cruz et al FYI

[Kavouss Arasteh]

Dear Nigel,
Being used to your ability to argue for any term, the so-called Invention
of DNS (according to your  analysis/description ) goes with individual/
individuals and not a country. By the way ,I dd not quite catch what did
you mean by "* a representation coupled with reliance thereupon."*
Tks
Kavouss


o

2016-05-22 18:25 GMT+02:00 Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>:

> Dear Nigel,
> Being used to your ability to argue for any term, the so-called Invention
> of DNS (
>
> 2016-05-22 18:18 GMT+02:00 Nigel Roberts <nigel at channelisles.net>:
>
>> It's not a problem. I understood the intention.
>>
>> The difference is that the DNS *WAS* invented, not discovered however.
>>
>> And invention can certainly create property rights.
>>
>> As -- in US and common-law countries -- a representation coupled with
>> reliance thereupon.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 22/05/16 16:16, Arasteh wrote:
>>
>>> Dear All
>>> Sorry for inattention using " invented" I correct it to be " discovered"
>>> Regards
>>> Kavouss
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>> On 22 May 2016, at 15:48, Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
>>> <mailto:kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear All,
>>>> I hesitate to comment on the letter sent but  looking at the messages
>>>> exchanged, I wish to briefly comment in an individual capacity ( A
>>>> CCWG participant only ) as follows
>>>> 1. The analysis made by the authors of the letter were made with some
>>>> degree of partiality and with lack of full understanding of the process
>>>> .
>>>> 2. As for the issue of "DNS Property" the attention of the authors are
>>>> drawn to the fact that , DNS like  ORIBITAL/ SPECTRUM RESOURCES are
>>>> natural resources and does not belong to anybody. It can be used by
>>>> any applicant under certain Rule and procedure .Therefore there is no
>>>> ownership on DNS at all.
>>>> It is evident that the internet has been mostly initiated by and from
>>>> a given country but it does not mean that such country is the owner of
>>>> the DNS. While It belongs to no body, it belongs to everybody.
>>>> The inventor of the electromagnetic waves and the countries in which
>>>> the issue was developed has never ever claimed to be the owner of the
>>>> spectrum .
>>>> Kavouss
>>>>
>>>> 2016-05-22 13:35 GMT+02:00 Nigel Roberts <nigel at channelisles.net
>>>> <mailto:nigel at channelisles.net>>:
>>>>
>>>>     I'm content to discuss it here - I was merely offering to take the
>>>>     discussion aside in case it was seen as off-topic (which is isn't,
>>>>     IMO, that much).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     On 22/05/16 11:36, Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
>>>>
>>>>         on Act.
>>>>
>>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>>     Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>>>>     Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>>>>     <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
>>>>
>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160522/c6870fe6/attachment.html>