[CCWG-ACCT] Notes, recordings, transcript for WS2 SO/AC Accountability Subgroup Meeting #5 - 1 Sept

[Shreedeep Rayamajhi]

Thank you Brenda

On 6 Sep 2016 6:09 a.m., "Brenda Brewer" <brenda.brewer at icann.org> wrote:

> Hello all,
>
>
>
> The notes, recordings and transcripts for WS2 *SO/AC Accountability
> Subgroup Meeting #5* – 1 September 2016 will be available here:
> https://community.icann.org/x/XRKsAw
>
>
>
> A copy of the notes may be found below.
>
>
>
> Thank you.
>
>
>
> With kind regards,
>
> Brenda Brewer
>
> MSSI Projects & Operations Assistant
>
> ICANN - Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers
>
>
>
> *Notes*
>
>
>
> 1. Call Admin and Roll Call / Apologies (2min- Staff)
>
> Cheryl Langdon-Orr audio only
>
> 2. Welcome - Opening Remarks  (3min- SDB, FB, CLO)
>
> ·        Steve DelBianco: There was no clear decision on SO/AC
> accountability question at the CCWG plenary on last
> Tuesday. Will present the slides
> presented at the plenary. (presentation of slides https:/
> /community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=
> 59643284&preview=/59643284/61609810/update%20on%20SOAC%
> 20Accountability%20%5BAug-2016%5D.pdf )
>
> ·        Cheryl Langdon-Orr: ccNSO has always sought non-member
> participantion. Other SOACs may also have other interesting and  unique
> mechanisms they use.
>
> ·        Farzaneh Badii: 2 questions are who are we accountable to
> and what are we accountable for.
>
> ·        Steve DelBianco: We know SO's are responsible to their
> members per the Bylaws - what we are looking at is do we
> need to increase this accountability.
>
> ·        Christopher Wilkinson: The Bylaws are clear. What we are
> talking about is the accountability of the delegates of the SOACs in the
> new
> Empowered Community. The incremental new accountability in the new
> accountability scheme in ICANN.
>
> ·        Farzaneh Badii: the MAR could be used as a soft approach to
> share best practices. Given there are no other questions
> let us move to the next agenda item.
>
> ·        Matthew Shears: the issue of scope has to be agreed -
> Christopher's approach (I understand) seeks to look at what the new
> accountability requirements post transition, but others,
> including myself, believe that this is about the
> accountability of SOs and ACs generally, not
> just post transition
>
> 3. Review (brief) of last call #3 and any Action Items /
>  Business Arising (5 min- SDB, FB)
>
> (skipped)
>
> 4. Discussion (25 min)
>
> - To whom are the SO/ACs accountable to
>
> - What are the SO/ACs accountable for
>
> - Discuss Matt's suggestion to start from track three: "
> Develop a detailed working plan on enhancing SO and AC accountability
> taking into consideration the comments made during the
> public comment period on the Third Draft Proposal."
>
> Googledoc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/
> 1WTRZZJ9B3Q6BHP6AlDHmoiep8NeshNpomBNM4bBXYpA/edit?ts=57ba7a43
>
> ·        Mathew Shears: accountability has 4 dimensions:
> Transparency, Consultation, Review, Redress. We should consider this when
> considering how to scope our work. MAR may be a
> distraction, we should start with the workplan.
>
> ·        Steve DelBianco: Appendix C contains a number of elements
> for ICANN when we began the work on WS1 and it may not be
> reasonable to think we should apply this to SOACs.
>
> ·        Mathew Shears: agree Steve. But we have addressed and
> resolved some of these criteria in WS1 and see if they could apply
> although many may not apply.
>
> ·        Cheryl Langdon-Orr: Mathew Shear's suggestion has meritt
> to explore these aspects and should be pursued. This could
> provide the basis
> for several sections of our report.
>
> ·        Steve DelBianco: Our charter says Review and Develop and
> we have to do the reviews to identify gaps. If you have criteria
> ahead of time it makes it easier to identify those potential gaps.
>
> ·        Cheryl Langdon-Orr: If we actually capture what is
> going on now and compare it will be very useful.
>
> ·        Athina Fragkouli: These should not be hard criteria -
> more points of reference.
>
> ·        Mathew Shears: We need to work with the SO and ACs if
> we are going to succeed.
>
> ·        Steve Delbianco: If members from the SO and ACs could
> come back at the next meeting to present the accountability
> mechanisms in each of these which are NOT in the Bylaws.
>
> 5.  AOB / Next Meeting (5min)
>
> ·        Steve DelBianco: Adjourned.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160906/438a25e9/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 92 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160906/438a25e9/image001-0001.gif>