[CCWG-ACCT] Answers to some common questions being encountered by the ICANN staff

Fri Sep 30 11:51:58 UTC 2016

Hearing in the case is scheduled for 130 PM Central Time (I think that is
GMT -5) today 
.

Paul

Paul Rosenzweig

 <mailto:paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com>
paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com

O: +1 (202) 547-0660

M: +1 (202) 329-9650

VOIP: +1 (202) 738-1739

 <http://www.redbranchconsulting.com/> www.redbranchconsulting.com

My PGP Key:  <http://redbranchconsulting.com/who-we-are/public-pgp-key/>
http://redbranchconsulting.com/who-we-are/public-pgp-key/ 

From: accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org
[mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of
Aikman-Scalese, Anne
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 2:06 PM
To: 'Jonathan Zuck' <JZuck at actonline.org>; Lori Schulman
<lschulman at inta.org>; 'Raoul Plommer' <plommer at gmail.com>; Martin Boyle
<martin.boyle at nominet.uk>
Cc: Accountability Cross Community
<accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Answers to some common questions being encountered
by the ICANN staff

Continuing Resolution passed.  Lawsuit filed in Texas:

https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/files/epress/Net_Complaint_-_FILED.pdf

Anne E. Aikman-Scalese

Of Counsel

520.629.4428 office

520.879.4725 fax

 <mailto:AAikman at lrrc.com> AAikman at lrrc.com

_____________________________

Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP

One South Church Avenue, Suite 700

Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611

 <http://lrrc.com/> lrrc.com

From: Jonathan Zuck [mailto:JZuck at actonline.org] 
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2016 12:24 PM
To: Lori Schulman; Aikman-Scalese, Anne; 'Raoul Plommer'; Martin Boyle
Cc: Accountability Cross Community
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Answers to some common questions being encountered
by the ICANN staff

Yes but things could still change.

Jonathan Zuck
President 
ACT|The App Association 
www.ACTonline.org <http://%3cbr/%3ewww.ACTonline.org> 

  _____  

From: accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org
<mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org>
<accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org
<mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org> > on behalf of
Lori Schulman <lschulman at inta.org <mailto:lschulman at inta.org> >
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2016 1:01:16 PM
To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne; 'Raoul Plommer'; Martin Boyle
Cc: accountability-cross-community at icann.org
<mailto:accountability-cross-community at icann.org> 
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Answers to some common questions being encountered
by the ICANN staff 

I saw a tweet from ISOC to that effect but I don’t have confirmation.  

Lori S. Schulman

Senior Director, Internet Policy

International Trademark Association (INTA)

+1-202-704-0408, Skype: lsschulman

From: accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org
<mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org>
[mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of
Aikman-Scalese, Anne
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2016 12:48 PM
To: 'Raoul Plommer' <plommer at gmail.com <mailto:plommer at gmail.com> >; Martin
Boyle <Martin.Boyle at nominet.uk <mailto:Martin.Boyle at nominet.uk> >
Cc: accountability-cross-community at icann.org
<mailto:accountability-cross-community at icann.org> 
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Answers to some common questions being encountered
by the ICANN staff

I heard the Rider preventing the IANA transition is OUT of the current
Continuing Resolution.  Can Steve or Becky confirm?

Anne

Anne E. Aikman-Scalese

Of Counsel

520.629.4428 office

520.879.4725 fax

 <mailto:AAikman at lrrc.com> AAikman at lrrc.com

_____________________________

Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP

One South Church Avenue, Suite 700

Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611

 <http://lrrc.com/> lrrc.com

From: accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org
<mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org>
[mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Raoul
Plommer
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2016 1:53 AM
To: Martin Boyle
Cc: accountability-cross-community at icann.org
<mailto:accountability-cross-community at icann.org> 
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Answers to some common questions being encountered
by the ICANN staff

Milton, I'm glad to see there's now been lots of responses to Ted Cruz's
spin and hopefully this debunking will hit Trump's peddling as well. They
probably won't learn to stop peddling lies but at least they've
underestimated some knowledgeable people within ICANN, who are able to
describe the IANA transition in layman's terms. 

I learned a couple of things from that article, too.. =)

-Raoul

On 22 September 2016 at 18:37, Martin Boyle <Martin.Boyle at nominet.uk
<mailto:Martin.Boyle at nominet.uk> > wrote:

Sorry for the delay, Nigel.

I agree with your conclusion.

As you note, the .int TLD is quite well identified other than for the
international databases:  there is no ambiguity in scope for organizations
established by international treaties.

If I have understood correctly, international databases were transferred to
be included under .arpa some long time ago.

Either way, I see no reason why .int should be opened up beyond
organizations established by international treaty at this stage and
certainly not without a properly constituted policy development process
(which would need to establish a process for appointing a new operator).

None of this, of course, nullifies your conclusion!

Martin

-----Original Message-----
From: Nigel Roberts [mailto:nigel at channelisles.net
<mailto:nigel at channelisles.net> ]
Sent: 16 September 2016 12:05
To: Martin Boyle <Martin.Boyle at nominet.uk <mailto:Martin.Boyle at nominet.uk> >
Cc: Christopher Wilkinson <lists at christopherwilkinson.eu
<mailto:lists at christopherwilkinson.eu> >;
accountability-cross-community at icann.org
<mailto:accountability-cross-community at icann.org> 
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Answers to some common questions being encountered
by the ICANN staff

The only reference is descriptive rather than policy setting. .INT predates
RFC1591.

It says, simply "This domain is for organizations established by
international treaties, or international databases". (The latter term is
undefined, but includes telephony applications).

You will find this text alongside all the other (at the time) existing
generic domains as follows.

Much of what is written below has been changed, and much of what has been
changed was changed outside ICANN.

I would be interested to know which policy decision classified some of the
gTLDs in this list as "dehors ICANN", and which within.

But as two of the gTLDs described in RFC 1591 are currently extremely
sensitive (MIL and GOV),from what I heard in the Senate hearing, perhaps its
best not to ask for an answer to this until after the end of the month??

>    World Wide Generic Domains:
>
>    COM - This domain is intended for commercial entities, that is
>          companies.  This domain has grown very large and there is
>          concern about the administrative load and system performance if
>          the current growth pattern is continued.  Consideration is
>          being taken to subdivide the COM domain and only allow future
>          commercial registrations in the subdomains.
>
>    EDU - This domain was originally intended for all educational
>          institutions.  Many Universities, colleges, schools,
>          educational service organizations, and educational consortia
>          have registered here.  More recently a decision has been taken
>          to limit further registrations to 4 year colleges and
>          universities.  Schools and 2-year colleges will be registered
>          in the country domains (see US Domain, especially K12 and CC,
>          below).1
>
>    NET - This domain is intended to hold only the computers of network
>          providers, that is the NIC and NOC computers, the
>          administrative computers, and the network node computers.  The
>          customers of the network provider would have domain names of
>          their own (not in the NET TLD).
>
>    ORG - This domain is intended as the miscellaneous TLD for
>          organizations that didn't fit anywhere else.  Some non-
>          government organizations may fit here.
>
>    INT - This domain is for organizations established by international
>          treaties, or international databases.
>
>    United States Only Generic Domains:
>
>    GOV - This domain was originally intended for any kind of government
>          office or agency.  More recently a decision was taken to
>          register only agencies of the US Federal government in this
>          domain.  State and local agencies are registered in the
> country
>
>
>
> Postel                                                          [Page 2]
>

> RFC 1591      Domain Name System Structure and Delegation     March 1994
>
>
>          domains (see US Domain, below).
>
>    MIL - This domain is used by the US military.

_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community

  _____  

This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this
message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or
agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended
recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any
attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and
confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the
Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521. 

  _____  

This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this
message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or
agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended
recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any
attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and
confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the
Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521. 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160930/8661d253/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 11181 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160930/8661d253/image001-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 11175 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160930/8661d253/image002-0001.png>