[CCWG-ACCT] Answers to some common questions being encountered by the ICANN staff
Nigel Roberts
nigel at channelisles.net
Fri Sep 30 12:05:58 UTC 2016
Depends what you mean by GMT (it's often misunderstood -- GMT and UTC
are the same thing).
So you are technically correct (although we don't use the term GMT
anymore except during the winter-time).
But GMT is NOT the same as "UK time" - that is "BST" right now.
So, if I understand this correctly, this will take place at 7:30 PM UK
and Ireland time, and 8:30 PM in Central Europe.
On 30/09/16 12:51, Paul Rosenzweig wrote:
> Hearing in the case is scheduled for 130 PM Central Time (I think that is
> GMT -5) today ….
>
>
>
> Paul
>
>
>
> Paul Rosenzweig
>
> <mailto:paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com>
> paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com
>
> O: +1 (202) 547-0660
>
> M: +1 (202) 329-9650
>
> VOIP: +1 (202) 738-1739
>
> <http://www.redbranchconsulting.com/> www.redbranchconsulting.com
>
> My PGP Key: <http://redbranchconsulting.com/who-we-are/public-pgp-key/>
> http://redbranchconsulting.com/who-we-are/public-pgp-key/
>
>
>
> From: accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org
> [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of
> Aikman-Scalese, Anne
> Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 2:06 PM
> To: 'Jonathan Zuck' <JZuck at actonline.org>; Lori Schulman
> <lschulman at inta.org>; 'Raoul Plommer' <plommer at gmail.com>; Martin Boyle
> <martin.boyle at nominet.uk>
> Cc: Accountability Cross Community
> <accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
> Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Answers to some common questions being encountered
> by the ICANN staff
>
>
>
> Continuing Resolution passed. Lawsuit filed in Texas:
>
>
>
> https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/files/epress/Net_Complaint_-_FILED.pdf
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Anne E. Aikman-Scalese
>
>
> Of Counsel
>
>
> 520.629.4428 office
>
>
>
> 520.879.4725 fax
>
>
> <mailto:AAikman at lrrc.com> AAikman at lrrc.com
>
>
> _____________________________
>
>
>
>
>
> Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP
>
>
> One South Church Avenue, Suite 700
>
>
> Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
>
>
> <http://lrrc.com/> lrrc.com
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Jonathan Zuck [mailto:JZuck at actonline.org]
> Sent: Friday, September 23, 2016 12:24 PM
> To: Lori Schulman; Aikman-Scalese, Anne; 'Raoul Plommer'; Martin Boyle
> Cc: Accountability Cross Community
> Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Answers to some common questions being encountered
> by the ICANN staff
>
>
>
> Yes but things could still change.
>
> Jonathan Zuck
> President
> ACT|The App Association
> www.ACTonline.org <http://%3cbr/%3ewww.ACTonline.org>
>
> _____
>
> From: accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org
> <mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org>
> <accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org
> <mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org> > on behalf of
> Lori Schulman <lschulman at inta.org <mailto:lschulman at inta.org> >
> Sent: Friday, September 23, 2016 1:01:16 PM
> To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne; 'Raoul Plommer'; Martin Boyle
> Cc: accountability-cross-community at icann.org
> <mailto:accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
> Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Answers to some common questions being encountered
> by the ICANN staff
>
>
>
> I saw a tweet from ISOC to that effect but I don’t have confirmation.
>
>
>
> Lori S. Schulman
>
> Senior Director, Internet Policy
>
> International Trademark Association (INTA)
>
> +1-202-704-0408, Skype: lsschulman
>
>
>
> From: accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org
> <mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org>
> [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of
> Aikman-Scalese, Anne
> Sent: Friday, September 23, 2016 12:48 PM
> To: 'Raoul Plommer' <plommer at gmail.com <mailto:plommer at gmail.com> >; Martin
> Boyle <Martin.Boyle at nominet.uk <mailto:Martin.Boyle at nominet.uk> >
> Cc: accountability-cross-community at icann.org
> <mailto:accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
> Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Answers to some common questions being encountered
> by the ICANN staff
>
>
>
> I heard the Rider preventing the IANA transition is OUT of the current
> Continuing Resolution. Can Steve or Becky confirm?
>
> Anne
>
>
>
>
> Anne E. Aikman-Scalese
>
>
> Of Counsel
>
>
> 520.629.4428 office
>
>
>
> 520.879.4725 fax
>
>
> <mailto:AAikman at lrrc.com> AAikman at lrrc.com
>
>
> _____________________________
>
>
>
>
>
> Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP
>
>
> One South Church Avenue, Suite 700
>
>
> Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
>
>
> <http://lrrc.com/> lrrc.com
>
>
>
>
>
> From: accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org
> <mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org>
> [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Raoul
> Plommer
> Sent: Friday, September 23, 2016 1:53 AM
> To: Martin Boyle
> Cc: accountability-cross-community at icann.org
> <mailto:accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
> Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Answers to some common questions being encountered
> by the ICANN staff
>
>
>
> Milton, I'm glad to see there's now been lots of responses to Ted Cruz's
> spin and hopefully this debunking will hit Trump's peddling as well. They
> probably won't learn to stop peddling lies but at least they've
> underestimated some knowledgeable people within ICANN, who are able to
> describe the IANA transition in layman's terms.
>
> I learned a couple of things from that article, too.. =)
>
> -Raoul
>
>
>
> On 22 September 2016 at 18:37, Martin Boyle <Martin.Boyle at nominet.uk
> <mailto:Martin.Boyle at nominet.uk> > wrote:
>
> Sorry for the delay, Nigel.
>
> I agree with your conclusion.
>
> As you note, the .int TLD is quite well identified other than for the
> international databases: there is no ambiguity in scope for organizations
> established by international treaties.
>
> If I have understood correctly, international databases were transferred to
> be included under .arpa some long time ago.
>
> Either way, I see no reason why .int should be opened up beyond
> organizations established by international treaty at this stage and
> certainly not without a properly constituted policy development process
> (which would need to establish a process for appointing a new operator).
>
> None of this, of course, nullifies your conclusion!
>
> Martin
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nigel Roberts [mailto:nigel at channelisles.net
> <mailto:nigel at channelisles.net> ]
> Sent: 16 September 2016 12:05
> To: Martin Boyle <Martin.Boyle at nominet.uk <mailto:Martin.Boyle at nominet.uk> >
> Cc: Christopher Wilkinson <lists at christopherwilkinson.eu
> <mailto:lists at christopherwilkinson.eu> >;
> accountability-cross-community at icann.org
> <mailto:accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
> Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Answers to some common questions being encountered
> by the ICANN staff
>
> The only reference is descriptive rather than policy setting. .INT predates
> RFC1591.
>
> It says, simply "This domain is for organizations established by
> international treaties, or international databases". (The latter term is
> undefined, but includes telephony applications).
>
> You will find this text alongside all the other (at the time) existing
> generic domains as follows.
>
> Much of what is written below has been changed, and much of what has been
> changed was changed outside ICANN.
>
> I would be interested to know which policy decision classified some of the
> gTLDs in this list as "dehors ICANN", and which within.
>
> But as two of the gTLDs described in RFC 1591 are currently extremely
> sensitive (MIL and GOV),from what I heard in the Senate hearing, perhaps its
> best not to ask for an answer to this until after the end of the month??
>
>
>
>
>> World Wide Generic Domains:
>>
>> COM - This domain is intended for commercial entities, that is
>> companies. This domain has grown very large and there is
>> concern about the administrative load and system performance if
>> the current growth pattern is continued. Consideration is
>> being taken to subdivide the COM domain and only allow future
>> commercial registrations in the subdomains.
>>
>> EDU - This domain was originally intended for all educational
>> institutions. Many Universities, colleges, schools,
>> educational service organizations, and educational consortia
>> have registered here. More recently a decision has been taken
>> to limit further registrations to 4 year colleges and
>> universities. Schools and 2-year colleges will be registered
>> in the country domains (see US Domain, especially K12 and CC,
>> below).1
>>
>> NET - This domain is intended to hold only the computers of network
>> providers, that is the NIC and NOC computers, the
>> administrative computers, and the network node computers. The
>> customers of the network provider would have domain names of
>> their own (not in the NET TLD).
>>
>> ORG - This domain is intended as the miscellaneous TLD for
>> organizations that didn't fit anywhere else. Some non-
>> government organizations may fit here.
>>
>> INT - This domain is for organizations established by international
>> treaties, or international databases.
>>
>> United States Only Generic Domains:
>>
>> GOV - This domain was originally intended for any kind of government
>> office or agency. More recently a decision was taken to
>> register only agencies of the US Federal government in this
>> domain. State and local agencies are registered in the
>> country
>>
>>
>>
>> Postel [Page 2]
>>
>
>> RFC 1591 Domain Name System Structure and Delegation March 1994
>>
>>
>> domains (see US Domain, below).
>>
>> MIL - This domain is used by the US military.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>
>
>
>
> _____
>
>
> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
> individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this
> message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or
> agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended
> recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
> copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you
> have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
> replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any
> attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and
> confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the
> Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
>
>
>
> _____
>
>
> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
> individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this
> message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or
> agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended
> recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
> copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you
> have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
> replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any
> attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and
> confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the
> Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community
mailing list