[CCWG-ACCT] Answers to some common questions being encountered by the ICANN staff
Greg Shatan
gregshatanipc at gmail.com
Fri Sep 30 13:09:32 UTC 2016
18:30 UTC.
On Friday, September 30, 2016, Nigel Roberts <nigel at channelisles.net> wrote:
> Depends what you mean by GMT (it's often misunderstood -- GMT and UTC are
> the same thing).
>
> So you are technically correct (although we don't use the term GMT anymore
> except during the winter-time).
>
> But GMT is NOT the same as "UK time" - that is "BST" right now.
>
> So, if I understand this correctly, this will take place at 7:30 PM UK and
> Ireland time, and 8:30 PM in Central Europe.
>
> On 30/09/16 12:51, Paul Rosenzweig wrote:
>
>> Hearing in the case is scheduled for 130 PM Central Time (I think that is
>> GMT -5) today ….
>>
>>
>>
>> Paul
>>
>>
>>
>> Paul Rosenzweig
>>
>> <mailto:paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com>
>> paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com
>>
>> O: +1 (202) 547-0660
>>
>> M: +1 (202) 329-9650
>>
>> VOIP: +1 (202) 738-1739
>>
>> <http://www.redbranchconsulting.com/> www.redbranchconsulting.com
>>
>> My PGP Key: <http://redbranchconsulting.com/who-we-are/public-pgp-key/>
>> http://redbranchconsulting.com/who-we-are/public-pgp-key/
>>
>>
>>
>> From: accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org
>> [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of
>> Aikman-Scalese, Anne
>> Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 2:06 PM
>> To: 'Jonathan Zuck' <JZuck at actonline.org>; Lori Schulman
>> <lschulman at inta.org>; 'Raoul Plommer' <plommer at gmail.com>; Martin Boyle
>> <martin.boyle at nominet.uk>
>> Cc: Accountability Cross Community
>> <accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
>> Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Answers to some common questions being
>> encountered
>> by the ICANN staff
>>
>>
>>
>> Continuing Resolution passed. Lawsuit filed in Texas:
>>
>>
>>
>> https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/files/epress/Net_
>> Complaint_-_FILED.pdf
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Anne E. Aikman-Scalese
>>
>>
>> Of Counsel
>>
>>
>> 520.629.4428 office
>>
>>
>>
>> 520.879.4725 fax
>>
>>
>> <mailto:AAikman at lrrc.com> AAikman at lrrc.com
>>
>>
>> _____________________________
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP
>>
>>
>> One South Church Avenue, Suite 700
>>
>>
>> Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
>>
>>
>> <http://lrrc.com/> lrrc.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Jonathan Zuck [mailto:JZuck at actonline.org]
>> Sent: Friday, September 23, 2016 12:24 PM
>> To: Lori Schulman; Aikman-Scalese, Anne; 'Raoul Plommer'; Martin Boyle
>> Cc: Accountability Cross Community
>> Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Answers to some common questions being
>> encountered
>> by the ICANN staff
>>
>>
>>
>> Yes but things could still change.
>>
>> Jonathan Zuck
>> President
>> ACT|The App Association
>> www.ACTonline.org <http://%3cbr/%3ewww.ACTonline.org>
>>
>> _____
>>
>> From: accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org
>> <mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org>
>> <accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org
>> <mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org> > on behalf of
>> Lori Schulman <lschulman at inta.org <mailto:lschulman at inta.org> >
>> Sent: Friday, September 23, 2016 1:01:16 PM
>> To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne; 'Raoul Plommer'; Martin Boyle
>> Cc: accountability-cross-community at icann.org
>> <mailto:accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
>> Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Answers to some common questions being
>> encountered
>> by the ICANN staff
>>
>>
>>
>> I saw a tweet from ISOC to that effect but I don’t have confirmation.
>>
>>
>>
>> Lori S. Schulman
>>
>> Senior Director, Internet Policy
>>
>> International Trademark Association (INTA)
>>
>> +1-202-704-0408, Skype: lsschulman
>>
>>
>>
>> From: accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org
>> <mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org>
>> [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of
>> Aikman-Scalese, Anne
>> Sent: Friday, September 23, 2016 12:48 PM
>> To: 'Raoul Plommer' <plommer at gmail.com <mailto:plommer at gmail.com> >;
>> Martin
>> Boyle <Martin.Boyle at nominet.uk <mailto:Martin.Boyle at nominet.uk> >
>> Cc: accountability-cross-community at icann.org
>> <mailto:accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
>> Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Answers to some common questions being
>> encountered
>> by the ICANN staff
>>
>>
>>
>> I heard the Rider preventing the IANA transition is OUT of the current
>> Continuing Resolution. Can Steve or Becky confirm?
>>
>> Anne
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Anne E. Aikman-Scalese
>>
>>
>> Of Counsel
>>
>>
>> 520.629.4428 office
>>
>>
>>
>> 520.879.4725 fax
>>
>>
>> <mailto:AAikman at lrrc.com> AAikman at lrrc.com
>>
>>
>> _____________________________
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP
>>
>>
>> One South Church Avenue, Suite 700
>>
>>
>> Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
>>
>>
>> <http://lrrc.com/> lrrc.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org
>> <mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org>
>> [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of
>> Raoul
>> Plommer
>> Sent: Friday, September 23, 2016 1:53 AM
>> To: Martin Boyle
>> Cc: accountability-cross-community at icann.org
>> <mailto:accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
>> Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Answers to some common questions being
>> encountered
>> by the ICANN staff
>>
>>
>>
>> Milton, I'm glad to see there's now been lots of responses to Ted Cruz's
>> spin and hopefully this debunking will hit Trump's peddling as well. They
>> probably won't learn to stop peddling lies but at least they've
>> underestimated some knowledgeable people within ICANN, who are able to
>> describe the IANA transition in layman's terms.
>>
>> I learned a couple of things from that article, too.. =)
>>
>> -Raoul
>>
>>
>>
>> On 22 September 2016 at 18:37, Martin Boyle <Martin.Boyle at nominet.uk
>> <mailto:Martin.Boyle at nominet.uk> > wrote:
>>
>> Sorry for the delay, Nigel.
>>
>> I agree with your conclusion.
>>
>> As you note, the .int TLD is quite well identified other than for the
>> international databases: there is no ambiguity in scope for organizations
>> established by international treaties.
>>
>> If I have understood correctly, international databases were transferred
>> to
>> be included under .arpa some long time ago.
>>
>> Either way, I see no reason why .int should be opened up beyond
>> organizations established by international treaty at this stage and
>> certainly not without a properly constituted policy development process
>> (which would need to establish a process for appointing a new operator).
>>
>> None of this, of course, nullifies your conclusion!
>>
>> Martin
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Nigel Roberts [mailto:nigel at channelisles.net
>> <mailto:nigel at channelisles.net> ]
>> Sent: 16 September 2016 12:05
>> To: Martin Boyle <Martin.Boyle at nominet.uk <mailto:Martin.Boyle at nominet.uk>
>> >
>> Cc: Christopher Wilkinson <lists at christopherwilkinson.eu
>> <mailto:lists at christopherwilkinson.eu> >;
>> accountability-cross-community at icann.org
>> <mailto:accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
>> Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Answers to some common questions being
>> encountered
>> by the ICANN staff
>>
>> The only reference is descriptive rather than policy setting. .INT
>> predates
>> RFC1591.
>>
>> It says, simply "This domain is for organizations established by
>> international treaties, or international databases". (The latter term is
>> undefined, but includes telephony applications).
>>
>> You will find this text alongside all the other (at the time) existing
>> generic domains as follows.
>>
>> Much of what is written below has been changed, and much of what has been
>> changed was changed outside ICANN.
>>
>> I would be interested to know which policy decision classified some of the
>> gTLDs in this list as "dehors ICANN", and which within.
>>
>> But as two of the gTLDs described in RFC 1591 are currently extremely
>> sensitive (MIL and GOV),from what I heard in the Senate hearing, perhaps
>> its
>> best not to ask for an answer to this until after the end of the month??
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> World Wide Generic Domains:
>>>
>>> COM - This domain is intended for commercial entities, that is
>>> companies. This domain has grown very large and there is
>>> concern about the administrative load and system performance if
>>> the current growth pattern is continued. Consideration is
>>> being taken to subdivide the COM domain and only allow future
>>> commercial registrations in the subdomains.
>>>
>>> EDU - This domain was originally intended for all educational
>>> institutions. Many Universities, colleges, schools,
>>> educational service organizations, and educational consortia
>>> have registered here. More recently a decision has been taken
>>> to limit further registrations to 4 year colleges and
>>> universities. Schools and 2-year colleges will be registered
>>> in the country domains (see US Domain, especially K12 and CC,
>>> below).1
>>>
>>> NET - This domain is intended to hold only the computers of network
>>> providers, that is the NIC and NOC computers, the
>>> administrative computers, and the network node computers. The
>>> customers of the network provider would have domain names of
>>> their own (not in the NET TLD).
>>>
>>> ORG - This domain is intended as the miscellaneous TLD for
>>> organizations that didn't fit anywhere else. Some non-
>>> government organizations may fit here.
>>>
>>> INT - This domain is for organizations established by international
>>> treaties, or international databases.
>>>
>>> United States Only Generic Domains:
>>>
>>> GOV - This domain was originally intended for any kind of government
>>> office or agency. More recently a decision was taken to
>>> register only agencies of the US Federal government in this
>>> domain. State and local agencies are registered in the
>>> country
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Postel [Page 2]
>>>
>>>
>> RFC 1591 Domain Name System Structure and Delegation March 1994
>>>
>>>
>>> domains (see US Domain, below).
>>>
>>> MIL - This domain is used by the US military.
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _____
>>
>>
>> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
>> individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this
>> message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or
>> agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended
>> recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
>> copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you
>> have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
>> replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and
>> any
>> attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and
>> confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the
>> Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
>>
>>
>>
>> _____
>>
>>
>> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
>> individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this
>> message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or
>> agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended
>> recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
>> copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you
>> have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
>> replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and
>> any
>> attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and
>> confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the
>> Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>>
>> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160930/d9468e78/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community
mailing list