[CCWG-ACCT] Timeline for HR and Jurisdiction publications

[Kavouss Arasteh]

Dear Co-Chair,
Thank you very much for your thoughts and vision.
However, I am not in favour of closing dates to be 19 March due to the fact
that for some SO/AC, physical ( FACE -TO FACE) discussion is considerably
contribute to the public comments thus we need to have sufficient time to
react. I suggest that the response time to HR be prolonged to end 30
calendre days after the end of ICANN 58. Once again we should not do the
thing harshly .Please allow those constituencies like GAC that only in a
physical meeting they would be able to have full debate on the matter and
then after have sufficient time to respond to the public comment.
This is a formal proposal.
I request ,at the same time, our dear chair ,Niels to also not to be in
hurry and allow us to think, top reflect and to react .
Regards
Kavouss

2017-01-18 13:33 GMT+01:00 Niels ten Oever <lists at nielstenoever.net>:

> Dear Co-Chairs,
>
> Thanks for this, reply in-line:
>
> On 01/18/2017 11:49 AM, Mathieu Weill wrote:
> > Dear Colleagues,
> >
> >
> >
> > Although it is uncertain exactly when the questionnaire for Jurisdiction
> > and the public comment for Human Rights will actually be published the
> > Co-Chairs would suggest that the closing date for both of these be after
> > the Copenhagen meeting.
> >
> >
>
> I don't think this would have my preference. Please allow me to explain.
>
> >
> > The reasoning behind this is that at best the standard 42 days
> > consultation period would end immediately prior to the Copenhagen - this
> > would imply chartering organizations and community members would be
> > considering this while they are preparing for Copenhagen - which as
> > Cheryl Langdon-Orr has pointed out on our last plenary is not an ideal
> > situation.
>
>
> Why would this be a problem? If the chartering organizations and
> community members consider it before Copenhagen, we could use the
> Copenhagen meeting to actually discuss the Public Comments and make
> efficient use of our time to ensure we're done before out deadline in
> June. Else I am afraid we have another F2F meeting with less content
> discussion than we might have hoped.
>
> > Additionally staff would not have enough time to prepare the
> > report on these for our consideration in Copenhagen.
> >
>
> The Framework of Interpretation is not an enormous document, so it would
> be great to understand why this would be a problem.
>
> >
> >
> > As such we would recommend that the closing period for the Human Rights
> > public consultation be Sunday 19 March 23:59 UTC and that the
> > Jurisdiction questionnaire request responses within 60 days of the
> > initial publication.
> >
> >
>
> I think it would be very beneficial for a constructive discussion in
> Copenhagen to get the public comments on the FoI-HR before the meeting.
>
> Next to that, I think it's also important to be able to keep on track
> with our timeline, as well as keep the work-flow in the Human Rights
> subgroup going. I am afraid that the longer this might take, the more
> people we might lose.
>
> Best,
>
> Niels
>
> >
> > Thank you in advance for your feedbacks on this proposal.
> >
> >
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Thomas, Leon & Mathieu
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> > Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
> >
>
> --
> Niels ten Oever
> Head of Digital
>
> Article 19
> www.article19.org
>
> PGP fingerprint    8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4
>                    678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20170118/1eebde2f/attachment.html>