[CCWG-ACCT] Timeline for HR and Jurisdiction publications

[Kavouss Arasteh]

Dear Co- CHAIR,
We are waiting to receive your formal reply to the question raised by
Farzaneh and reiterated and conveyed to you by Greg
Regards
Kavouss

2017-01-18 13:46 GMT+01:00 Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>:

> Dear Co-Chair,
> Thank you very much for your thoughts and vision.
> However, I am not in favour of closing dates to be 19 March due to the
> fact that for some SO/AC, physical ( FACE -TO FACE) discussion is
> considerably contribute to the public comments thus we need to have
> sufficient time to react. I suggest that the response time to HR be
> prolonged to end 30 calendre days after the end of ICANN 58. Once again we
> should not do the thing harshly .Please allow those constituencies like GAC
> that only in a physical meeting they would be able to have full debate on
> the matter and then after have sufficient time to respond to the public
> comment.
> This is a formal proposal.
> I request ,at the same time, our dear chair ,Niels to also not to be in
> hurry and allow us to think, top reflect and to react .
> Regards
> Kavouss
>
> 2017-01-18 13:33 GMT+01:00 Niels ten Oever <lists at nielstenoever.net>:
>
>> Dear Co-Chairs,
>>
>> Thanks for this, reply in-line:
>>
>> On 01/18/2017 11:49 AM, Mathieu Weill wrote:
>> > Dear Colleagues,
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Although it is uncertain exactly when the questionnaire for Jurisdiction
>> > and the public comment for Human Rights will actually be published the
>> > Co-Chairs would suggest that the closing date for both of these be after
>> > the Copenhagen meeting.
>> >
>> >
>>
>> I don't think this would have my preference. Please allow me to explain.
>>
>> >
>> > The reasoning behind this is that at best the standard 42 days
>> > consultation period would end immediately prior to the Copenhagen - this
>> > would imply chartering organizations and community members would be
>> > considering this while they are preparing for Copenhagen - which as
>> > Cheryl Langdon-Orr has pointed out on our last plenary is not an ideal
>> > situation.
>>
>>
>> Why would this be a problem? If the chartering organizations and
>> community members consider it before Copenhagen, we could use the
>> Copenhagen meeting to actually discuss the Public Comments and make
>> efficient use of our time to ensure we're done before out deadline in
>> June. Else I am afraid we have another F2F meeting with less content
>> discussion than we might have hoped.
>>
>> > Additionally staff would not have enough time to prepare the
>> > report on these for our consideration in Copenhagen.
>> >
>>
>> The Framework of Interpretation is not an enormous document, so it would
>> be great to understand why this would be a problem.
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > As such we would recommend that the closing period for the Human Rights
>> > public consultation be Sunday 19 March 23:59 UTC and that the
>> > Jurisdiction questionnaire request responses within 60 days of the
>> > initial publication.
>> >
>> >
>>
>> I think it would be very beneficial for a constructive discussion in
>> Copenhagen to get the public comments on the FoI-HR before the meeting.
>>
>> Next to that, I think it's also important to be able to keep on track
>> with our timeline, as well as keep the work-flow in the Human Rights
>> subgroup going. I am afraid that the longer this might take, the more
>> people we might lose.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Niels
>>
>> >
>> > Thank you in advance for your feedbacks on this proposal.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Best regards,
>> >
>> > Thomas, Leon & Mathieu
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> > Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>> >
>>
>> --
>> Niels ten Oever
>> Head of Digital
>>
>> Article 19
>> www.article19.org
>>
>> PGP fingerprint    8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4
>>                    678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9
>> _______________________________________________
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20170118/388cbeb3/attachment-0001.html>