[CCWG-ACCT] Timeline for HR and Jurisdiction publications

[matthew shears]

I am not sure what is meant by the the first sentence.  However, 60 days 
is, and should be, more than a sufficient period of time for the public 
consultation, particularly given that the standard public comment period 
is, I understand from the co-chairs e-mail, 42 days.

Matthew


On 18/01/2017 21:03, Kavouss Arasteh wrote:
> Dear David, yes  some sector do not realize that others including  
> some if not all 8 those who are your allies  do not have problem ).GAC 
> members would have problem.
> The shorter the time ,the better for some people but not for some , 
> the majority of GAC Members.
> I strongly oppose to the 19 March deadline for the reasons already given
> Regards
> Kavouss
>
>
> 2017-01-18 21:05 GMT+01:00 McAuley, David <dmcauley at verisign.com 
> <mailto:dmcauley at verisign.com>>:
>
>     Thanks Mathieu,
>
>     I see no issue with the schedule as proposed.
>
>     Best regards,
>
>     David
>
>     David McAuley
>
>     International Policy Manager
>
>     Verisign Inc.
>
>     703-948-4154 <tel:%28703%29%20948-4154>
>
>     *From:*accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org
>     <mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org>
>     [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org
>     <mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org>] *On
>     Behalf Of *Mathieu Weill
>     *Sent:* Wednesday, January 18, 2017 5:50 AM
>     *To:* 'Accountability Cross Community'
>     *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] [CCWG-ACCT] Timeline for HR and Jurisdiction
>     publications
>
>     Dear Colleagues,
>
>     Although it is uncertain exactly when the questionnaire for
>     Jurisdiction and the public comment for Human Rights will actually
>     be published the Co-Chairs would suggest that the closing date for
>     both of these be after the Copenhagen meeting.
>
>     The reasoning behind this is that at best the standard 42 days
>     consultation period would end immediately prior to the Copenhagen
>     - this would imply chartering organizations and community members
>     would be considering this while they are preparing for Copenhagen
>     - which as Cheryl Langdon-Orr has pointed out on our last plenary
>     is not an ideal situation. Additionally staff would not have
>     enough time to prepare the report on these for our consideration
>     in Copenhagen.
>
>     Additionally the jurisdiction questionnaire is meant to be
>     considered by a wider community and as such it would be good to
>     extend the standard period to 60 days to allow everyone ample
>     opportunity to answer the questionnaire.
>
>     As such we would recommend that the closing period for the Human
>     Rights public consultation be Sunday 19 March 23:59 UTC and that
>     the Jurisdiction questionnaire request responses within 60 days of
>     the initial publication.
>
>     Thank you in advance for your feedbacks on this proposal.
>
>     Best regards,
>
>     Thomas, Leon & Mathieu
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>     Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>     <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
>     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>     <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community

-- 
------------
Matthew Shears
Global Internet Policy and Human Rights
Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT)
+ 44 771 2472987

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20170118/0a5bb6ca/attachment.html>