[CCWG-ACCT] SOAC Accountability group in CCWG WS2 - report after plenary 2nd reading, on 29-Mar-2017

[avri doria]

Hi,

I find this way of explaining it unfortunately.

The subgroup sent a paper with the word 'Mutual' in.  For the subgroup
leaders to now indicate that this was just the whimsy of a minority of
the plenary when that had been the recommendation of the subgroup seems
backwards.

I believe that the plenary group chairs played fast and loose with the
process by changing the work of the subteam on the fly instead of
sending it back to the subteam.  It should have either approved the
second reading or sent it back for further work.


avri

 I'm late / I'm late / For a very important date. / No time to say
"Hello, Goodbye". / I'm late, I'm late, I'm late.


On 29-Mar-17 10:40, Steve DelBianco wrote:
> Per the decision reached on today’s plenary call, here is the SOAC
> Accountability Report as approved for Public Comment. 
>
> The 2 minor edits to the previous draft are:
>
>     remove the word “ranks” on page 7.
>     remove the word “mutual” on page 32.
>
>
> The call for Public Comment could indicate this explanation and seek
> community input:
>
>
>     A minority of CCWG members prefer that the optional annual
>     Accountability Roundtable discussion described on page 32 be
>     expanded to include “mutual” accountability, where each SO/AC is
>     held accountable to the other SO/ACs.
>
> From: Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco at netchoice.org
> <mailto:sdelbianco at netchoice.org>>
> Date: Thursday, March 23, 2017 at 3:01 PM
> To: Accountability Cross Community
> <accountability-cross-community at icann.org
> <mailto:accountability-cross-community at icann.org>>
> Cc: Cheryl Langdon-Orr <langdonorr at gmail.com
> <mailto:langdonorr at gmail.com>>, farzaneh badii
> <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com <mailto:farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>>,
> "ws2-so_ac at icann.org <mailto:ws2-so_ac at icann.org>"
> <ws2-so_ac at icann.org <mailto:ws2-so_ac at icann.org>>, ACCT-Staff
> <acct-staff at icann.org <mailto:acct-staff at icann.org>>, Bernard Turcotte
> <turcotte.bernard at gmail.com <mailto:turcotte.bernard at gmail.com>>
> Subject: SOAC Accountability group in CCWG WS2 - report for plenary
> 2nd reading, on 29-Mar-2017
>
> To our CCWG colleagues:
>
> Attached, for your consideration, is the report of the SOAC
> Accountability group of Work Stream 2, revised per comments at our
> first reading at the 10-Mar plenary in Copenhagen.  Including:
>  
>
>     Clarify we are looking only at activities within ICANN, so we are
>     not looking at NRO and IETF outside of ICANN.
>
>     For best practices instead of saying”should consider”, we say
>     "should implement, to the extent these practices are applicable
>     and an improvement…”
>
>     Suggest that future ATRTs may examine the extent to which best
>     practices have been implemented.
>
>     Recommend an optional mutual accountability roundtable at annual
>     general meetings, at the option of SO/AC chairs.
>      
>     Add 5 examples of reasons to close a meeting to public observation 
>
>     Make best practices more consistent regarding meeting notes and
>     minutes
>
>     Add the dimension of diversity to outreach best practices.
>
> We have also attached a redline from version 1.0 to version 1.1
>
> Our group looks forward to your questions and comments during 2nd
> reading on 29-Mar.
>
> Regards,
> Steve DelBianco, Cheryl Langdon-Orr, and Farzaneh Badii
> Co-Rapporteurs, SOAC Accountability Group, CCWG WS2
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus