[Accountability-dt] Charter for Circulation -- Suggested Questions

[Drazek, Keith]

All, here are some suggested  questions for both Workstream 1 and Workstream 2, for consideration by the CCWG:

  *   What mechanisms are needed to ensure ICANN's accountability to the non-governmental-led multi-stakeholder community once NTIA has disengaged from its stewardship role?
  *   What enhancements or reforms are needed to ICANN's existing accountability mechanisms?
  *   What new accountability reforms or mechanisms are needed?
  *   What enhancements or reforms are required to be implemented before NTIA allows the expiration of the IANA functions contract? [Workstream 1]
     *   How will these enhancements or reforms be stress-tested?
  *   What enhancements or reforms must be committed to before NTIA allows the expiration of the IANA functions contract, but could be implemented after. [Workstream 1]
     *   If the implementation of enhancements or reforms are to be deferred, how can the community be assured they will be implemented?
     *   How will these enhancements or reforms be stress-tested?
  *   What enhancements or reforms can be addressed after NTIA allows the expiration of the IANA functions contract? [Workstream 2]
     *   If there are enhancements or reforms that can be addressed after NTIA disengages, what new or existing processes ensure they will be addressed and implemented?
     *   How will  these enhancement or reforms be stress-tested?
  *   If accountability enhancements and reforms are made through changes to ICANN's Articles of Incorporation or By-Laws, how can the community be assured that those changes will be permanent, or not subject to unilateral amendment by the ICANN Board at a later date?


Thanks,
Keith


From: accountability-dt-bounces at icann.org [mailto:accountability-dt-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Grace Abuhamad
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2014 1:15 PM
To: accountability-dt at icann.org
Subject: [Accountability-dt] Charter for Circulation
Importance: High

Hi all,

Here attached are the redline and clean versions of the charter incorporating comments from Bart, Matthew, and Izumi.

Izumi - I think your main concern (if I read your edits correctly) was keeping the line about the mailing list. That line is still in the charter, but I had moved it down one paragraph in the last draft iteration to include it with other tools for the CCWG.

Main changes:

  *   Accepted all of Bart's and Matthew's edits
  *   Per Matthew's comment about clarity between the two cross community groups, I changed CCWG to "CCWG-Accountability" and CWG to "CWG-Stewardship" in the whole text
  *   Per Matthew's comment about "other groups'" I included a link to the ICG RFP and wrote out who those "other groups" are (the numbers and protocol parameters communities)
Some comments were unanswered, so I have copied them below for discussion on the list. They are in the redline, but I made the clean version "really clean" so that it's easy to circulate to your communities.

  *   (Grace) referring to the stakeholder definition: Should we include a citation? The definition text seems to be in a pay-only document. http://www.efqm.org/understanding-an-organisations-stakeholders
  *   Action: Keith to provide questions asap no later then Monday

Talk to you on Monday,
Grace

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-dt/attachments/20141102/8881ee28/attachment.html>