[Accountability-dt] Updated version for review & outstanding action items
Athina Fragkouli
athina.fragkouli at ripe.net
Thu Oct 30 10:40:15 UTC 2014
Dear all,
Many thanks to all for your contributions.
Please find attached some further input from Izumi Okutani and myself.
Looking forward to our meeting later today.
Best regards,
Athina
On 29/10/14 12:24, Marika Konings wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> Please find attached the latest version of the charter which includes
> the language circulated earlier this week by Mathieu, the language of
> the board resolution in section V and the proposed removal of references
> to the ICG in section V that were a left-over from the IANA Stewardship
> Transition charter (apologies for not spotting these before). To
> facilitate your review, I’ve attached a redline as well as clean
> version. Please note that the following action items are still outstanding:
>
> * DT members to review issues collated in public comment period and
> phrase those into questions that can be included for each work
> stream - Keith volunteered to work with RySG to develop a first list
> of questions for DT review. Matthew volunteered to assist with this
> as well.
> * Avri to review deliverables section and suggest additional edits
> based on comments received, if needed
>
> Please note that Mathieu has also provided alternative language for
> section III concerning the work plan. You are encouraged to review the
> two versions and indicate whether you have a preference for one or the
> other.
>
> If there are any other issues that need to be considered or alternative
> language you would like to propose, please share these with the DT
> before the next meeting which is scheduled for *Thursday 30 October at
> 13.00 UTC.*
>
> Best regards,
>
> Marika
>
> From: Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org
> <mailto:marika.konings at icann.org>>
> Date: Monday 27 October 2014 22:29
> To: "accountability-dt at icann.org <mailto:accountability-dt at icann.org>"
> <accountability-dt at icann.org <mailto:accountability-dt at icann.org>>
> Subject: [Accountability-dt] For your review - notes & action items and
> updated version of charter
>
> Dear All,
>
> Please find below the notes and action items from today’s meeting as
> well as attached the latest version of the charter which incorporates
> the changes discussed during today’s meeting.
>
> As a reminder, the action items are as follows:
>
> * Mathieu to draft language to update problem statement - need to
> close gap in accountability (trust of stakeholders in current
> accountability mechanisms - not deemed sufficient, part of which
> needs to be addressed prior to transition, part of which can be
> done after. Expand in goals section what the CWG is expected to
> achieve. Following that, Mathieu will review other parts of the
> document to make sure these align (including work stream 1 and 2
> descriptions)
> * Staff to collate Larry Stricklyn's & Fadi's statements/comments from
> recent speeches related to this effort
> * DT members to review issues collated in public comment period and
> phrase those into questions that can be included for each work
> stream - Keith volunteered to work with RySG to develop a first list
> of questions for DT review. Matthew volunteered to assist with this
> as well.
> * Avri to review deliverables section and suggest additional edits
> based on comments received, if needed
> * Update draft language in working relationship with CCWG and ICG to
> reflect comments received (*done*)
> * Next meeting has been scheduled for *Thursday 30 October at 13.00 UTC*
>
> Please use the attached version for any further edits / comments.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Marika
> *
> *
> *Notes and Action Items – DT meeting of 27 October*
>
> Reminder of target date for delivery of charter: 3 November 2014
>
> *Recap of changes made to Charter since last meeting*:
>
> * Latest version includes most up to date changes (including Matthew
> Keith, and David today)
> * Edits to fix some left over references to ICG where no longer
> appropriate as well as updates to reflect that more than one
> proposal may be submitted by the ICG as the two work streams are
> likely to be completed along different timelines
> * SOI clarification
> * Clarification about ATRT role in concensus calls
>
> *Review of charter:*
>
> * Include definition of the term "accountability" in the Charter (from
> NETmundial Statement): "Accountable: Mechanisms for independent
> checks and balances as well asfor review and redress should exist."
>
> /Question concerning scope/:
>
> * What is demarcation between WS1 and WS2?
> * Focus on pre-transition vs. post-transition accountability as
> opposed to IANA vs. non-IANA?
> * The reference to IANA Functions accountability is being dealt with
> by the other CCWG. This group should be focused on accountability
> reforms made necessary by NTIA's disengagement from its legacy role.
> * ICANN's accountability to the community as a whole may need to be
> reflected in the charter - is there a conflict between currently
> proposed definitions of work streams & scope?
> * NTIA oversight created accountability across ICANN - how to recreate
> that general accountability mechanism prior to any transition.
> * Everything should be on the table for consideration - up to the CCWG
> to determine what should be done before transition and what can wait
> until after.
> * Recommendations coming out of work stream 1 are expected to provide
> a path for work going on in work stream 2. Process for addressing
> anything coming up in work stream 2 is one of the objectives of work
> stream 1.
> * Transition of role of US Government is at the heart of the work of
> the CCWG and also dictates timeline / sense of urgency - if scope is
> too wide it risks the effort to get lost
> * See challenges identified by Larry Strickling in his speech
> * Stress test one of the key deliverables of CCWG
>
> /DT Agreements;/
>
> * Delineation between work stream 1 and 2 should be pre and post
> transition
> * Charter should not limit accountability mechanisms or functions
> affected as part of the CCWG work
>
> /Deliverables, timeframes & reporting/
>
> * Proposed edits from Avri (see document circulated)
> * Two additions proposed: 1) when solutions are proposed, deliverables
> need to include stress test, scenarios to demonstrate that the
> solutions are resistent to capture / stress; 2) after assessing
> current situation, priorities need to be identified - what is
> required before transition and what can wait until after (big impact
> vs. limited impact) (Avri tried to capture these as part of her
> edits which will be shared with the DT shortly)
> * Do stress tests need to be defined or conducted prior to transition?
> At least for stream 1, this should be a requirement to be conducted
> in theory. For work stream 2, may not be required, or at least not
> in the short run.
> * Stress test - proposals that demonstrate on paper how they would
> resist 'stress' (capture, financial crisis) - incl. list of
> nightmare scenarios. What are the stresses that were tested and how
> the various mechanisms enable ICANN survive these 'stresses'.
>
> /Membership/
>
> * Include as a for example, the link to criteria identified for the
> community working group (see
> https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/enhancing-accountability-faqs-2014-08-22-en#12)
>
> /Working relationship with ICG / IANA Stewardship CWG/
>
> * Consider including reference to regular meetings between chairs
> * Clarify the role of the board (not related to co-ordination, but to
> final approval of proposals) - include link to board resolution
> * Review this section and consider clarifying
> * Main focus should be on IANA Stewardship Transition CWG as ICG just
> has a co-ordinating role
>
> /Expert Advisors/
>
> * Section captures comments provided by Mathieu
>
> *Action item:*
>
> * Mathieu to draft language to update problem statement - need to
> close gap in accountability (trust of stakeholders in current
> accountability mechanisms - not deemed sufficient, part of which
> needs to be addressed prior to transition, part of which can be
> done after. Expand in goals section what the CWG is expected to
> achieve. Following that, Mathieu will review other parts of the
> document to make sure these align (including work stream 1 and 2
> descriptions)
> * Staff to collate Larry Stricklyn's & Fadi's statements/comments from
> recent speeches related to this effort
> * DT members to review issues collated in public comment period and
> phrase those into questions that can be included for each work
> stream - Keith volunteered to work with RySG to develop a first list
> of questions for DT review. Matthew volunteered to assist with this
> as well.
> * Avri to review deliverables section and suggest additional edits
> based on comments received, if needed
> * Update draft language in working relationship with CCWG and ICG to
> reflect comments received
> * Next meeting has been scheduled for *Thursday 30 October at 13.00 UTC*
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-dt mailing list
> Accountability-dt at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-dt
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Enhancing ICANN Accountability Draft Charter - Updated 30 October 2014_IOAF.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 86038 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-dt/attachments/20141030/550ab701/EnhancingICANNAccountabilityDraftCharter-Updated30October2014_IOAF-0001.docx>
More information about the Accountability-dt
mailing list