[Accred-Model] Philly Special 2.0

[Steve Levy]

Thanks for your hard work, Michael. My only feedback right now relates to your planned ADR rules. I am leery of aggressive cybersquatters misusing such a claim as leverage against a Legitimate Interest User and so I feel the burden of proof should be set at an appropriate level that will punish transgressions but discourage misuse. I also feel the process should be of a somewhat informal nature so that, like the UDRP and URS, it is not absolutely necessary for either party to engage the services of an attorney to represent them in a claim.  I feel this would serve both Data Subjects and Legitimate Interest Users alike.

Best regards
Steve


[cid:CA625674-A524-4B70-928C-AB24D5B0341E]

Steven M. Levy, Esq.

Accent Law Group, Inc.
301 Fulton St.
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19147

United States

Phone: +1-215-327-9094
Email: slevy at AccentLawGroup.com<mailto:slevy at accentlawgroup.com>

Website: www.AccentLawGroup.com<http://www.accentlawgroup.com/>

<http://www.accentlawgroup.com/>LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/stevelevy43a/<http://www.linkedin.com/in/stevelevy43a/>
________________________________________
Notice: This communication, including attachments, may contain information that is confidential and protected by the attorney/client or other privileges. It constitutes non-public information intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If the reader or recipient of this communication is not the intended recipient, an employee or agent of the intended recipient who is responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, or you believe that you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this e-mail, including attachments without reading or saving them in any manner. The unauthorized use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this e-mail, including attachments, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Receipt by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is not a waiver of any attorney/client or other privilege.

From: Accred-Model <accred-model-bounces at icann.org<mailto:accred-model-bounces at icann.org>> on behalf of Michael Palage <michael at palage.com<mailto:michael at palage.com>>
Date: Wednesday, May 30, 2018 at 1:05 AM
To: "accred-model at icann.org<mailto:accred-model at icann.org>" <accred-model at icann.org<mailto:accred-model at icann.org>>
Subject: [Accred-Model] Philly Special 2.0

Hello All,

The list has been rather silent so I thought I would share the next iteration of my proposed differential access (aka tiered) model. Unfortunately ICANN has required Registration Authorities in the Temporary Specification to provide access to Legitimate Interest users but has provided little to no thought leadership on how to move forward with that demand.

As noted previously, my model defers to the hard work that others on this list have done on establishing the credentials for accreditation bodies. I instead have focus on market dynamics, governance and Registrant administrative remedies.

In addition to this policy/governance framework document, I have also drafted an Registrant Data Access Agreement which I will be posting shortly.  This is designed to be a standard agreement by with Legitimate Interest Users can enter into with Registration Authorities to access their non-public Registrant data.

The only other missing piece which I have started work on this week, is the proposed ADR rules by which Data Subjects will be able to initiate a claim against a Legitimate Interest User which they believe has exceeded the scope of their legitimate use.

With these three components, there will exist an entire eco-system for a new differentiated (tiered) access  model. In the spirit of the GDPR this is a Privacy by Design model that is centered on placing the rights of the Data Subject at the apex of that hierarchy, as opposed to the current model where the Data Subject’s fundamental human rights are all too often collateral damage to other commercial interests.

As always I welcome any feedback.

Best regards,

Michael


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accred-model/attachments/20180530/15835d1b/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Accent Law Logo NEW Very Small[1].png
Type: image/png
Size: 17053 bytes
Desc: Accent Law Logo NEW Very Small[1].png
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accred-model/attachments/20180530/15835d1b/AccentLawLogoNEWVerySmall1.png>