[bylaws-coord] New ICANN Bylaws Rough Draft version and accompanying documents

Sun Mar 20 14:03:13 UTC 2016

Holly,

Not my call to make - just pointing out the possibilities to be helpful.

Cheers

B.

On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 9:59 AM, Gregory, Holly <holly.gregory at sidley.com>
wrote:

> Thanks Bernie.  Will someone make the change at ICANN or should we try to
> do it?
>
>
>
> Sent with Good (www.good.com)
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Bernard Turcotte
> *Sent:* Sunday, March 20, 2016 08:23:43 AM
> *To:* Steve DelBianco
> *Cc:* Gregory, Holly; bylaws-coord at icann.org; John Jeffrey; Sidley ICANN
> CCWG; ICANN-Adler; Hilton, Tyler; Zagorin, Janet S.; Hofheimer, Joshua T.;
> Mohan, Vivek; Clark, Michael A.; Boucher, Rick; Daniel Halloran; Flanagan,
> Sharon; Kerry, Cameron; McNicholas, Edward R.; Amy Stathos; Boelter,
> Jessica C.K.; Fuller, Miles; Tam, Tennie H.
> *Subject:* Re: [bylaws-coord] New ICANN Bylaws Rough Draft version and
> accompanying documents
>
> All,
>
> In Windows Word's latest version, and previous versions I think, you are
>  not limited to those 15 colours if you use the Paint Bucket icon which is
> 7 icons to the right of the Highlight function.
>
> You can also use global Search and Replace specifying Highlight in BOTH
> fields (Find and Replace) to replace the current highlighting from what it
> is now to a new colour bu unfortunately this seems to only work with the 15
> colours - but could allow for use of duller colours.
>
> Finally if someone would want to use the Bucket option manually you could
> just pick a softer yellow vs the highlight yellow and go through the
> documents and manually replace the highlighting - similarly for the other
> colours.
>
>
> Cheers
>
> B.
>
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 8:31 AM, Steve DelBianco via bylaws-coord <
> bylaws-coord at icann.org> wrote:
>
>> I find the color text highlights really helpful, too.  Here’s a quick way
>> to soften the colors — if you using Apple display:
>>
>> Go to Settings, select Displays, the select Color
>>
>> On the list of Display Profiles, select the ROMM RGB and you’ll see
>> primary colors go softer.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: <bylaws-coord-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of "Gregory, Holly via
>> bylaws-coord" <bylaws-coord at icann.org>
>> Reply-To: "Gregory, Holly" <holly.gregory at sidley.com>
>> Date: Saturday, March 19, 2016 at 11:12 PM
>> To: "bylaws-coord at icann.org" <bylaws-coord at icann.org>, John Jeffrey <
>> john.jeffrey at icann.org>, Sidley ICANN CCWG <sidleyicannccwg at sidley.com>,
>> ICANN-Adler <ICANN at adlercolvin.com>
>> Cc: "Zagorin, Janet S." <jzagorin at sidley.com>, "Hofheimer, Joshua T." <
>> jhofheimer at sidley.com>, "Mohan, Vivek" <vivek.mohan at sidley.com>, "Clark,
>> Michael A." <mclark at sidley.com>, "Tam, Tennie H." <tennie.tam at sidley.com>,
>> "Boucher, Rick" <rboucher at sidley.com>, Daniel Halloran <
>> daniel.halloran at icann.org>, "Flanagan, Sharon" <sflanagan at sidley.com>,
>> "Kerry, Cameron" <ckerry at sidley.com>, "McNicholas, Edward R." <
>> emcnicholas at sidley.com>, "Boelter, Jessica C.K." <jboelter at sidley.com>,
>> "Hilton, Tyler" <thilton at sidley.com>, "Fuller, Miles" <wfuller at sidley.com>,
>> Amy Stathos <amy.stathos at icann.org>
>> Subject: Re: [bylaws-coord] New ICANN Bylaws Rough Draft version and
>> accompanying documents
>>
>> Dear John and Sam, The color coding in the draft is very helpful for our
>> substantive review and we appreciate it. However because the colors chosen
>> are so deep we are having difficulty reading -- or to be more precise, we
>> can read but it is very tiring. Is there a way on your side to change the
>> colors to softer less intense shading?
>>
>>
>>
>> Sent with Good (www.good.com
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.good.com&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=1-1w8mU_eFprE2Nn9QnYf01XIV88MOwkXwHYEbF2Y_8&m=IqVNNSqW8x3wVoaZT7YN1WSgkrwaYn96pkv_dPQH6W0&s=Sc4J9Z9VY39TUHqMwlnkDrM8GYjAtYM4mOCJ7KBnQr4&e=>
>> )
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> *From:* John Jeffrey
>> *Sent:* Friday, March 18, 2016 09:58:30 PM
>> *To:* bylaws-coord at icann.org; Sidley ICANN CCWG; ICANN-Adler
>> *Cc:* Samantha Eisner; Daniel Halloran; Amy Stathos; Boucher, Rick;
>> Clark, Michael A.; Flanagan, Sharon; Fuller, Miles; Gregory, Holly; Hilton,
>> Tyler; Hofheimer, Joshua T.; Boelter, Jessica C.K.; Kerry, Cameron;
>> McNicholas, Edward R.; Mohan, Vivek; Tam, Tennie H.; Zagorin, Janet S.;
>> Rosemary E. Fei
>> *Subject:* New ICANN Bylaws Rough Draft version and accompanying
>> documents
>>
>> *Dear Bylaws Coordination Group, Sidley Legal Team and Adler Legal Team, *
>>
>> *The ICANN Legal Team submits the follow documents for Bylaws
>> Coordination Group and legal teams to review.  We have put forth our best
>> efforts to make changes on top of the current ICANN Bylaws to bring in the
>> CCWG and appropriate ICG proposals.  I am sure in the 244 pages and
>> approximately 90,000 words (including the comments and notes) that there
>> are some errors, but we have strived to diligently draft to the intent of
>> the proposals and recommendations.  *
>>
>> *We have provided a suite of documents below to help access the content
>> including a full set and a redline against the current ICANN Bylaws.  We
>> have included Breakouts re each CCWG recommendation, and we have also
>> attempted to set out where we think there is a need for additional
>> discussions both with the lawyers and with the Bylaws Coordination Group. *
>>
>> *The documents below do not include the CWG Bylaws that Sidley sent to us
>> today, or our markup of the IRP language that was included from Sidley’s
>> updated version forwarded yesterday (although the Sidley text is included
>> in our rough draft). *
>>
>> *Attached please find the following documents (and a brief explanation of
>> each):*
>>
>> *1) Initial Rough Draft of the revised ICANN Bylaws (Word version) —
>> incorporating suggested changes to reflect the CCWG and where appropriate
>> ICG proposals. It is an extensive document of 244 pp. (including
>> significant unaltered portions of the current bylaws).  Within this
>> document, we have marked it up with guidance and color-coding on the
>> approach we have taken to the different provisions: *
>>
>> *a) Text highlighted in Green are provisions where the Proposals could be
>> implemented in the Bylaws in a manner that appeared clear and not to
>> require additional clarifications.  This was our best attempt at
>> identifying these portions, and inclusion in green does not in any way
>> indicate a lack of willingness to further discuss these areas.*
>>
>> *b) Text highlighted in Yellow are provisions where the implementation of
>> the Proposals will benefit from additional discussions among the lawyers
>> and possibly the coordination group to confirm the intent.  *
>>
>> *c) Text highlighted in Blue are provisions that have been identified as
>> the places were conversations among and with the coordination group will be
>> important to make sure that the intent of the Proposals are appropriately
>> reflected in the Bylaws. *
>>
>>
>> *2) A redline of the Initial Rough Draft of the revised ICANN Bylaws
>> against the current ICANN Bylaws *
>>
>>
>> *3) Breakouts by Recommendation of the Rough Draft of the revised ICANN
>> Bylaws — A series of 16 different documents setting out a recommendation by
>> recommendation rough draft of the revised ICANN Bylaws.*
>>
>> *4) Key Questions Document - a listing of some of the key questions for
>> consideration by the Bylaws Coordination Group. *
>> *——*
>>
>> *We look forward to working with all of you in the coming days and next
>> week, to get ICANN’s Bylaws in the best form possible to effectuate these
>> important changes.*
>>
>> *We truly hope these views of the markups are useful and that you receive
>> them in the spirit that they are offered… to help all of us to be able to
>> collaborate and work through these Bylaws changes in the most effective way
>> possible — to enable the creation of a new and stronger,
>> community-empowered ICANN*
>>
>> *Sincerely,*
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *John Jeffrey General Counsel & Secretary, ICANN 12025 Waterfront Drive,
>> Suite 300 Los Angeles, California  90094-2536*
>>
>>
>> *direct dial - +1.310.301.5834 <%2B1.310.301.5834> mobile -
>> +1.310.404.6001 <%2B1.310.404.6001> JJ at ICANN.org <JJ at ICANN.org>*
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ****************************************************************************************************
>> This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is
>> privileged or confidential.
>> If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any
>> attachments and notify us
>> immediately.
>>
>>
>> ****************************************************************************************************
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> bylaws-coord mailing list
>> bylaws-coord at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/bylaws-coord
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailman_listinfo_bylaws-2Dcoord&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=1-1w8mU_eFprE2Nn9QnYf01XIV88MOwkXwHYEbF2Y_8&m=IqVNNSqW8x3wVoaZT7YN1WSgkrwaYn96pkv_dPQH6W0&s=DnWYBErkwEB1GgsooJFeLNSw9c59sz363Zw_7rHp44E&e=>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/private/bylaws-coord/attachments/20160320/0ba4e6c1/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Screen Shot 2016-03-20 at 8.30.13 AM.png
Type: image/png
Size: 11451 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/private/bylaws-coord/attachments/20160320/0ba4e6c1/ScreenShot2016-03-20at8.30.13AM-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Screen Shot 2016-03-20 at 8.26.40 AM.png
Type: image/png
Size: 43184 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/private/bylaws-coord/attachments/20160320/0ba4e6c1/ScreenShot2016-03-20at8.26.40AM-0001.png>