[Capacity-Building-WG] Fwd: DOODLE - ICANN Online Education Platform
salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro at gmail.com
Mon Jul 1 04:38:13 UTC 2013
FYI and FYR
Sent from my iPad
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Heidi Ullrich <Heidi.Ullrich at icann.org>
> Date: July 1, 2013, 10:50:39 AM GMT+12:00
> To: sandra hoferichter <info at hoferichter.eu>
> Cc: ICANN At-Large Staff <staff at atlarge.icann.org>, Sylvia Herlein Leite <sylvia at internautabrasil.org>, José Francisco Arce <josefranciscoarce at gmail.com>, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com>, "Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro" <salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro at gmail.com>, Tijani Ben Jemaa <tijani.benjemaa at planet.tn>, Dev Anand Teelucksingh <devtee at gmail.com>, Chris Gift <chris.gift at icann.org>, Nora Abusitta <nora.abusitta at icann.org>
> Subject: Re: DOODLE - ICANN Online Education Platform
> Hi All,
> This is meant to be strictly an informal call and should not have been forwarded to the capacity building WG list. Could whoever forwarded the invitation please send apologies to the list?
> Nora will be speaking with us several times in Durban.
> Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 30, 2013, at 3:35 PM, "sandra hoferichter" <info at hoferichter.eu> wrote:
>> Dear all, I am a bit irritated. In the invitation to this call, sent to a limited number of people, it is stated that: "you have been selected to participate in this informal call". It was not sent to a WG mailing list in order to gather huge participation from the WGs dealing with this issue.
>> As far as I understood the call was meant to provide Nora an update on activities and status. The broader community discussion, to my understanding, should have been held during the WG meetings in Durban. Now that the doodle was forwarded to the At-Large Capacity Building mailing list we have quite a lot of members participating in this call and I wonder if the scope of the call has changed now?
>> On another note, if the scope has changed and we are organising a community call, it would be just fair to invite also other community members from other WGs (like the ICANN Academy WG), because this issue does not only concern At-Large.
>> My personal opinion is that it would makes sense to have a discussion with a hand full of people first and broaden the discussion with the community in Durban during the respective meetings. But I am not sure it this is still possible, now that a number of WG members confirmed their availability.
>> Best Sandra
>> (Note: This message was send from my iPhone - I do apologise for any misspelling.)
>> Am 27.06.2013 um 00:20 schrieb At-Large Staff <staff at atlarge.icann.org>:
>>> Dear All,
>>> We would like to invite you to an informal call with Nora Abusitta, VP of Public Responsibility Programs, to discuss the next steps in the ICANN Online Education Platform. Nora will be leading the development of this program from the staff side. Nora will be speaking with the At-Large community in Durban and would like to take this opportunity to introduce herself and to discuss the status of the program. We would also like to hear your groups’ needs and your views on the next steps for the At-Large community.
>>> As you are involved in Working Groups or other activities that will or will potentially benefit from the Online Education Platform, you have been selected to participate in this informal call.
>>> Please complete the attached Doodle poll to identify the most suitable time for everyone.
>>> Thank you!
>>> Kind regards,
>>> Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Julia Charvolen
>>> ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC
>>> E-mail: staff at atlarge.icann.org
>>> One World, One Internet
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the capacity-building-wg