[cc-humanrights] [cc-humanrights-research] ICANN visualization 2nd draft

[Zalnieriute, Monika]

Hi Niels,

Great work! I agree with Niels - dendogram would be great!

Some comments from me:

1.  'Human Rights in Internet Governance' might be too broad, as ICANN and its policies are just part of the 'Internet Governance Discussions', so we might want to narrow it down somewhat to make it explicit this is only ICANN-related. As there are many other areas in IG that affect HR, but we dont list them here.

Some purely on visuals:

2. In my view, the glossary and all the columns at the top would look better at the bottom of the page. Similarly, the words 'THEME', etc, in my view, look better at the top.

3. (purely personal taste):  orange boxes with white text look somewhat not in consistency with the overall elegance of the style, perhaps because of black shadowing or something - I am not sure, but it gives me somewhat different look than the rest. And that rest looks very good:)

Best wishes,

Monika



----

Dr. Monika Zalnieriute


Melbourne Law School | The University of Melbourne I law.unimelb.edu.au I
Center for Media, Data and Society I Central European University I cmds.ceu.edu I
Executive Committee I Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group I ICANN I icann.org I
Z E P H I R O : Progressive Platform for Human Rights I zephiroplatform.org I
Centre for Internet & Human Rights I European University Viadrina I cihr.eu I








________________________________________
From: cc-humanrights-research-bounces at icann.org <cc-humanrights-research-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Niels ten Oever <niels at article19.org>
Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2016 10:07 AM
To: Human Rights; cc-humanrights-research at icann.org
Cc: Giulia De Amicis
Subject: [cc-humanrights-research] ICANN visualization 2nd draft

Dear colleagues,

Attached a second draft visualization made by the designer, as always,
looking forward to your comments!

What text is missing? What more would you like to be in here?

I was thinking (maybe too much, maybe not), we could maybe also do a
dendogram based on rights. With the UDHR at the bottom, the ICCPR and
the ICESCR coming from that and then all the smaller treaties following
that, and finally of course the Ruggie Principles and the Global
compact. This might build on the work done by Tatiana and Aarti on
relevant frameworks? It defintely needs some research and lawyer touch :)

Curious to hear what you all think!

Best,

Niels

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, forwarding, or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited without the express permission of the sender. If you received this communication in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.