[Ccwg-auctionproceeds] Conflict Of Interest, was Fwd: Board reply to CCWG-AP

[Erika Mann]

Wunderbar!
I'm certain we can find a solution that works for us all and that the
satisfies the CCWG and the Board.

Erika

On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 11:36 PM, Marc Gauw <marc.gauw at nlnet.nl> wrote:

> Ok, well, after all those warm words, l'll take the bet and continue :-)
>
>
> Op 5 sep. 2017 om 19:28 heeft Evan Leibovitch <evan at telly.org> het
> volgende geschreven:
>
> I join those suggesting that Marc reconsider resigning.​
>
> This is ICANN, where there is effectively no such thing as conflict of
> interest so long as you declare. Were ICANN institutionally to have real
> concerns about CofI, many PDPs would be nearly barren of membership and the
> RAAs would look ... very different. As a minimum.
>
> It is with the acceptance of this reality in mind that I pause to consider
> why the Board chooses *this* as the place to make a stand about “*Was
> this decision taken without conflict of interest?*”. That says more about
> the Board's attitude to this WG than the interests of our membership.
>
> - Evan
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
> Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
> Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-auctionproceeds/attachments/20170906/7c0460bc/attachment-0001.html>