[Ccwg-auctionproceeds] [Ext] Re: REMINDER: Deadline 21 May 2020 - CCWG Auction Proceeds Consensus Call

Mon May 18 21:13:46 UTC 2020

Hi Maureen,

Thanks for your response.

Just a point of clarification on next steps -- the CCWG is not planning to have another public comment period. Once the consensus call is complete and minority viewpoints (if any) have been submitted, the CCWG will submit the Final Report to the Chartering Organizations for their consideration. Additional details about this process are available in the charter<https://community.icann.org/display/CWGONGAP/CCWG+Charter>.

If there are any questions, please don’t hesitate to reach out to the leadership team.

Kind regards,
Emily

From: Maureen Hilyard <maureen.hilyard at gmail.com>
Date: Monday, 18 May 2020 at 23:00
To: Vanda Scartezini <vanda at scartezini.org>
Cc: Emily Barabas <emily.barabas at icann.org>, Ccwg-auctionproceeds <ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org>
Subject: [Ext] Re: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] REMINDER: Deadline 21 May 2020 - CCWG Auction Proceeds Consensus Call

Hi Emily

Im good with the report and letter to move the process on to the public comment.

Maureen

On Mon, 18 May 2020, 10:55 am Vanda Scartezini, <vanda at scartezini.org<mailto:vanda at scartezini.org>> wrote:
Thank you Emily. Finished reading and I am in full agreement with the supplemental report  and  the letter.
Stay Safe.
Vanda Scartezini
Polo Consultores Associados
Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004
01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253
Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464
Sorry for any typos.

From: Ccwg-auctionproceeds <ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces at icann.org<mailto:ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces at icann.org>> on behalf of Emily Barabas <emily.barabas at icann.org<mailto:emily.barabas at icann.org>>
Date: Monday, May 18, 2020 at 10:03
To: Ccwg-auctionproceeds <ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org<mailto:ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org>>
Subject: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] REMINDER: Deadline 21 May 2020 - CCWG Auction Proceeds Consensus Call

Dear all,

As a reminder, the following deadlines are coming up:

•         Thursday 21 May: Deadline for members to challenge the Co-Chairs’ designation of the level of consensus on CCWG recommendations (report attached, see details below)

•         Thursday 21 May: Deadline to submit proposed edits to the draft cover letter to Chartering Organizations, which will accompany the Final Report (draft attached, see details below)

•         Thursday 28 May: Deadline to submit minority viewpoints (see details below)

Kind regards,
Emily

From: Erika Mann <erika at erikamann.com<mailto:erika at erikamann.com>>
Date: Thursday, 7 May 2020 at 15:42
To: Ccwg-auctionproceeds <ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org<mailto:ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org>>
Cc: Ching Chiao <ching.chiao at gmail.com<mailto:ching.chiao at gmail.com>>, Emily Barabas <emily.barabas at icann.org<mailto:emily.barabas at icann.org>>, Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org<mailto:marika.konings at icann.org>>, Joke Braeken <joke.braeken at icann.org<mailto:joke.braeken at icann.org>>
Subject: [Ext] Fwd: Message for Erika to send to CCWG today [Subject: CCWG Auction Proceeds Consensus Call - Deadline 21 May 2020]

Dear all,

Thank you to those who participated in the final poll on mechanisms. Please find attached the Final Report reflecting results of the poll (see poll results in excel format here<https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/126432332/CCWG%20Auction%20Proceeds%20-%20Final%20Survey%20on%20Mechanisms%20-%20Summary.xlsx?version=1&modificationDate=1588328283000&api=v2>). With 15 members and 4 participants responding, poll results indicate strong support for mechanism A, followed by mechanism B with the majority of members supporting that the CCWG should recommend two mechanisms. Section 4.7 of the Report and Recommendation #1 have been updated to reflect this result.

Seeing that there were no additional comments on the last revision circulated, the leadership team now considers the Final Report complete. The next step in the process is for the Co-Chairs to make a designation of the level of consensus for the recommendations in the report (see charter<https://community.icann.org/display/CWGONGAP/CCWG+Charter> for details, an excerpt of which is included below). We believe that the CCWG supports the recommendations in this report by Consensus. Consensus is defined as “a position where a small minority disagrees, but most agree.” If you are a member of the CCWG and you disagree with this designation, please respond to the email list no later than 21 May at 23:59 UTC (14 days from today).

Please note that at this stage, we are not revisiting the substance of the recommendations or asking you to state your positions on specific recommendations. We are requesting a response only if you believe that the consensus designation is incorrect. If you would like to submit a minority viewpoint on the content of the recommendations, you may do so, but this is separate from the consensus call. Minority statements will be due 28 May at 23:59 UTC (21 days from today). Minority statements may be included in an annex to the Final Report or linked from the Final Report to the wiki, depending on the length and number of statements received.

Please also find attached a draft cover letter to send to the Chartering Organizations with the Final Report. If you have questions or comments on this draft letter, please send to the email list no later than 21 May at 23:59 UTC (14 days from today).

We hope you are all well, take good care and,

kind regards,

Erika and Ching

Excerpt from the CCWG Charter regarding Consensus Designation:

In developing its output, work plan and any other reports, the CCWG shall seek to act by consensus. The chair(s) may make a call for Consensus. If making such a call they should always make reasonable efforts to involve all Chartering Organization appointed Members of the CCWG (or sub-teams, if applicable). The chair(s) shall be responsible for designating each position as having one of the following designations:

a)        Full Consensus - a position where no minority disagrees; identified by an absence of objection

b)        Consensus – a position where a small minority disagrees, but most agree

In the absence of Full Consensus, the chair(s) should allow for the submission of minority viewpoint(s) by the Chartering Organization appointed members and these, along with the consensus view, shall be included in the report.

_______________________________________________
Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org<mailto:Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds
_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy [icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_privacy_policy&d=DwMFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=mBQzlSaM6eYCHFBU-v48zs-QSrjHB0aWmHuE4X4drzI&m=u0aVXf2k9QCE-nRekFjEVKu7RfQGeHtL_V6LMMp5hZQ&s=S-JPUyl1XjNk83DZNRbCUyTvKVcmWMKnmYHNHXb_tKQ&e=>) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos [icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_privacy_tos&d=DwMFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=mBQzlSaM6eYCHFBU-v48zs-QSrjHB0aWmHuE4X4drzI&m=u0aVXf2k9QCE-nRekFjEVKu7RfQGeHtL_V6LMMp5hZQ&s=KR2k75bxNmL7GAxpWQ9MuqCqvDBOKRFv4XkLx8XMjXM&e=>). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-auctionproceeds/attachments/20200518/bea18ca5/attachment-0001.html>