[council] RE: Council report required for the Board on the recently approved WHOIS recommendation

[Olof Nordling]

Hi Bruce,
Thanks for the reminder - Maria and I have talked about it and she will
produce the report, aiming for the February Board meeting. We have also
considered whether we should launch an additional public comment period on
it. In view of the Bylaws, Art 6.3.1, we don't see that as necessary in this
case and we're keen to hear your view on it.
Best regards
Olof

-----Original Message-----
From: Bruce Tonkin [mailto:Bruce.Tonkin at melbourneit.com.au] 
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2005 6:31 AM
To: olof nordling
Cc: council at gnso.icann.org
Subject: Council report required for the Board on the recently approved
WHOIS recommendation

Hello Olof,

As the Council approved the recent WHOIS recommendation in its meeting
on 
28 Nov 2005.

See
http://gnso.icann.org/issues/tf-final-rpt-25oct05.htm for Final Report.

The next step is to finalise a "Council Report to the Board".  See quote
from the bylaws below.

As discussed in the Council meeting today, it would be appropriate to
prepare this report for consideration by the Board in its Board meeting
in February 2006.

Regards,
Bruce




11. Council Report to the Board

The Staff Manager will be present at the final meeting of the Council,
and will have five (5) calendar days after the meeting to incorporate
the views of the Council into a report to be submitted to the Board (the
"Board Report"). The Board Report must contain at least the following:

a. A clear statement of any Supermajority Vote recommendation of the
Council;

b. If a Supermajority Vote was not reached, a clear statement of all
positions held by Council members. Each statement should clearly
indicate (i) the reasons underlying each position and (ii) the
constituency(ies) that held the position;

c. An analysis of how the issue would affect each constituency,
including any financial impact on the constituency;

d. An analysis of the period of time that would likely be necessary to
implement the policy;

e. The advice of any outside advisors relied upon, which should be
accompanied by a detailed statement of the advisor's (i) qualifications
and relevant experience; and (ii) potential conflicts of interest;

f. The Final Report submitted to the Council; and

g. A copy of the minutes of the Council deliberation on the policy
issue, including the all opinions expressed during such deliberation,
accompanied by a description of who expressed such opinions.