[council] Proposed simplified WHOIS motion for 20 July 2006
Mawaki Chango
ki_chango at yahoo.com
Tue Jul 18 16:49:48 UTC 2006
Totally agree!
--- Ross Rader <ross at tucows.com> wrote:
>
> I think it would be politically useful if this motion
> contained a
> reference to the other motion (formerly clause 3) that you
> removed from
> this for scope purposes. It need only be referential and
> something along
> the lines of "The GNSO Council will undertake the
> implementation of an
> additional work plan designed to better understand the needs
> of
> governments, via the GAC, related to the development of an
> understandable definition of the minimum purposes...etc.."
>
> The reason for this would be to ensure that our intent
> regarding these
> initiatives remains very clear: i.e. that we are still
> committed to
> working to understand the broad range of issues, resolving
> outstanding
> existing Whois policy questions, etc. regardless of what
> definition of
> scope they fall under. Bootstrapping this work inside this
> motion will
> help those following along from home better understand our
> work by
> providing clear line of sight to the additional work items
> this ongoing
> discussion has spawned. My fear is that simply dropping this
> language
> entirely without explanation may be unduly confusing for
> anyone but the
> insiders. Any steps we can take to share a clear plan forward
> with our
> stakeholders and other concerned and interested parties will
> definitely
> make our job easier in the coming months.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> --
>
> -ross rader
> general manager,
> domain direct/netidentity/nameplanet
>
> Have you checked out the NetIdentity/Nameplanet Weblog?
> http://netidentity.weblog.info
>
More information about the council
mailing list