[council] Draft reply Council on GNSO reform

[Robin Gross]

This looks good to me, Philip, thank you.

Robin


Philip Sheppard wrote:

>Thank for the dialogue on our statement.
>I tend to agree with Chuck in that WGs are such a key part of the BGC proposals that it will
>look very odd (and unhelpful for the Board) if we say nothing.
>
>I believe the problem may be that I constructed our reply to be REACTIVE  to the BGC
>wording.
>What I think we have all been saying is more refined than the BGC text.
>So I suggest a simple PROACTIVE statement of what we want (and a removal of the relevant
>part of the table under item 3 on working groups).
>See attached.
>
>I have also changed to "comment" the title that was previously "partial support" above the
>comments we made.
>
>I hope we can all agee to this latest version. I have done my very best to use the most
>neutral language and capture the minimal level of unanimity we have on Council.
>If there is support, Glen please submit. I will be out of the office for the rest of the day
>/ week.
>
>Philip
>
>  
>