[council] Motion on PDP vote on Issues report on Post-Expiration Domain Name Recovery

[Gomes, Chuck]

I amended my Post-Expiration Domain Name Recovery alternative motion as
suggested by Avri and as highlighted in the attached file and I posted
it on the wiki.

Chuck

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org 
> [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2008 3:57 PM
> To: Council GNSO
> Subject: Re: [council] Motion on PDP vote on Issues report on 
> Post-Expiration Domain Name Recovery
> 
> 
> Hi Chuck,
> 
> If the council is ready to vote on your motion,  then i think 
> it would be appropriate to amend it to include the date for 
> voting on the PDP, i.e. the pro-forma motion one I am 
> offering can be folded into yours as a friendly amendment if 
> you accept it.
> 
> On the other hand if the council is not ready to vote on 
> yours or if it fails in a vote, then my pro-forma motion can 
> stand as it is.  I.e.  
> my motion can be contingent on yours.
> 
> Would that be ok?
> 
> a.
> 
> On 12 Dec 2008, at 17:41, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> 
> > Thanks Avri. If my alternative motion passes, I would 
> suggest what I 
> > hope would be a friendly amendment that would change 8 
> January 2009 to
> > 29 January 2009.  That would give Staff until 15 January to provide 
> > the clarification that my motion seeks.
> >
> > I am comfortable waiting until we see whether my motion is seconded 
> > and passes.
> >
> > Chuck
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org
> >> [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> >> Sent: Friday, December 12, 2008 11:43 AM
> >> To: Council GNSO
> >> Subject: [council] Motion on PDP vote on Issues report on 
> >> Post-Expiration Domain Name Recovery
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> It was mentioned that in keeping with our  current 
> practice of being 
> >> explicit with timings as much as possible,  we should be more 
> >> specific about when we will take the required PDP votes after 
> >> receiving an Issues report.  This motion is intended to fill that 
> >> gap.
> >>
> >> thanks
> >>
> >> a.
> >>
> >> ----
> >>
> >> Moved by: Avri Doria
> >> Seconded:
> >>
> >> Whereas:
> >>
> >> An Issues Report on Post-Expiration Domain Name Recovery has been 
> >> produced and introduced to the GNSO Council.
> >>
> >> Resolve:
> >>
> >> The GNSO Council members will consult with their constituencies in 
> >> preparation for a vote on a PDP and other possible motions at the 
> >> Council meeting on 8 January 2009.
> >>
> >
> 
> 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Motion - GNSO Council Post-Expiration Domain Name Recovery Issues Report - 12 Dec 08 v2.doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 36864 bytes
Desc: Motion - GNSO Council Post-Expiration Domain Name Recovery Issues Report - 12 Dec 08 v2.doc
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20081214/4813873b/Motion-GNSOCouncilPost-ExpirationDomainNameRecoveryIssuesReport-12Dec08v2.doc>